星光互联，是MJJ单手摘月的创办的。其旗下提供了各种奇葩国度的VPS以及服务器，当然也有国人比较中意的，例如HK例如韩国，例如JP等。这次送测的是其韩国的VPS下面让我们来看看其配置把：
CPU：2核心
内存：1G
硬盘：40G(官网参数是30G。请参照实际VPS为准，如躲开算你的，少开发TK找他麻烦。)
流量：500G @20Mbps
IPs：1IPv4
架构：OpenVZ
可选系统：Linux
官方网址：www.starrydns.com
测试项目一：
CPU信息：
CPU核心数量的多少代表着你多线程运行的程序的快慢。当然性能不是绝对有优势的，看卖家把U平分到多少个人头上。不过一般来说U核心越多，性能越好。
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 26
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU L5520 @ 2.27GHz
stepping : 5
microcode : 22
cpu MHz : 2266.728
cache size : 8192 KB
physical id : 0
siblings : 8
core id : 0
cpu cores : 4
apicid : 0
initial apicid : 0
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 11
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx rdtscp lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good xtopology nonstop_tsc aperfmperf pni dtes64 monitor ds_cpl vmx est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr pdcm dca sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt lahf_lm ida dtherm tpr_shadow vnmi flexpriority ept vpid
bogomips : 4533.45
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:processor : 1
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 26
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU L5520 @ 2.27GHz
stepping : 5
microcode : 22
cpu MHz : 2266.728
cache size : 8192 KB
physical id : 0
siblings : 8
core id : 1
cpu cores : 4
apicid : 2
initial apicid : 2
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 11
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx rdtscp lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good xtopology nonstop_tsc aperfmperf pni dtes64 monitor ds_cpl vmx est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr pdcm dca sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt lahf_lm ida dtherm tpr_shadow vnmi flexpriority ept vpid
bogomips : 4533.45
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:
使用的是L5520的U，如果是双LL5520的服务器那么平分到每台VPS上的性能还是可以的。看下面的benchmark把。
测试项目二：
空载内存信息：
内存是一个VPS最重要的部分之一。显然内存越大能够运行的程序越多，能够承载的访问量也越多。
[root@af ~]# free -m
total used free shared buffers cached
Mem: 1024 70 953 0 0 37
-/+ buffers/cache: 33 990
Swap: 2048 0 2048
空载33M的内存占用，非常不错的系统精简。
硬盘：
[root@af ~]# df -h
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/ploop38668p1 40G 681M 37G 2% /
none 512M 4.0K 512M 1% /dev
none 512M 0 512M 0% /dev/shm
硬盘占用只有681M 还有很多可以用。非常不错。
测试项目三：
硬盘IO测试：
DD测试硬盘
[root@af ~]# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=128k count=4k
4096+0 records in
4096+0 records out
536870912 bytes (537 MB) copied, 0.525168 s, 1.0 GB/s
[root@af ~]# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=128k count=4k
4096+0 records in
4096+0 records out
536870912 bytes (537 MB) copied, 0.529174 s, 1.0 GB/s
[root@af ~]# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=128k count=4k
4096+0 records in
4096+0 records out
536870912 bytes (537 MB) copied, 0.511812 s, 1.0 GB/s
看来DD已经不能阻挡月妹纸的步伐了！
hdparm专用测试软件无法在OpenVZ上使用（也许是阿福姿势不对~总之只有DD了。）好吧，DD的话，月妹纸已经超神了。
测试项目四：
端口速率：
Port Speed
IN速率：
[root@af dev]# wget http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test
–2015-04-02 18:49:15– http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test
Resolving cachefly.cachefly.net… 205.234.175.175
Connecting to cachefly.cachefly.net|205.234.175.175|:80… connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response… 200 OK
Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/octet-stream]
Saving to: `100mb.test’100%[======================================>] 104,857,600 11.0M/s in 11s
2015-04-02 18:49:26 (9.46 MB/s) – `100mb.test’ saved [104857600/104857600]
看到最高速率11M的时候阿福顿时泪流满面，看来IN口是100M共享啊。
OUT 速率测试
从阿里云下载数据
[root@iZ23289a3qgZ ~]# wget -c http://应MJJ要求隐藏之/100mb.test
–2015-04-02 23:00:05– http://应MJJ要求隐藏之/100mb.test
Connecting to 应MJJ要求隐藏之:80… connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response… 200 OK
Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/x-tar]
Saving to: `100mb.test’100%[======================================>] 104,857,600 103K/s in 15m 38s
2015-04-02 23:15:43 (109 KB/s) – `100mb.test’ saved [104857600/104857600]
只能说的到国内的速度蛋疼
从RamNode下载
[root@ramnode ~]# wget -c http://应MJJ要求隐藏之/100mb.test
–2015-04-02 23:17:07– http://应MJJ要求隐藏之/100mb.test
Connecting to 应MJJ要求隐藏之:80… connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response… 200 OK
Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/x-tar]
Saving to: `100mb.test’100%[======================================>] 104,857,600 8.94M/s in 14s
2015-04-02 23:17:21 (7.29 MB/s) – `100mb.test’ saved [104857600/104857600]
MJJ片我们不止20M的带宽！
测试项目五：
UnixBench Score
Unixbench跑分:400以下为性能低下400-600正常水平，高于1K性能优异。如果朋友们遇到Unixbench跑分出错的问题，欢迎查找：Unixbench 测试脚本错误集锦
wget http://byte-unixbench.googlecode.com/files/unixbench-5.1.3.tgz
tar zxvf unixbench-5.1.3.tgz
cd unixbench-5.1.3
make
./Run
# # # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # #
# # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # # #
# # # # # # ## ##### ##### # # # # ######
# # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # #
# # # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # #
#### # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # #Version 5.1.2 Based on the Byte Magazine Unix Benchmark
Multi-CPU version Version 5 revisions by Ian Smith,
Sunnyvale, CA, USA
December 22, 2007 johantheghost at yahoo period com1 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Double-Precision Whetstone 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Execl Throughput 1 2 3
1 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1 2 3
1 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1 2 3
1 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1 2 3
1 x Pipe Throughput 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Pipe-based Context Switching 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Process Creation 1 2 3
1 x System Call Overhead 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1 2 3
1 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1 2 3
2 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
2 x Double-Precision Whetstone 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
2 x Execl Throughput 1 2 3
2 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1 2 3
2 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1 2 3
2 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1 2 3
2 x Pipe Throughput 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
2 x Pipe-based Context Switching 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
2 x Process Creation 1 2 3
2 x System Call Overhead 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
2 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1 2 3
2 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1 2 3
========================================================================
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.2)System: af.test: GNU/Linux
OS: GNU/Linux — 2.6.32-042stab105.14 — #1 SMP Fri Mar 13 20:06:37 MSK 2015
Machine: x86_64 (x86_64)
Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap=”UTF-8″, collate=”UTF-8″)
CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU L5520 @ 2.27GHz (4533.7 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU L5520 @ 2.27GHz (4533.7 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
17:07:31 up 13:08, 1 user, load average: 0.17, 3.38, 3.21; runlevel 3————————————————————————
Benchmark Run: Fri Apr 03 2015 17:07:31 – 17:35:58
2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of testsDhrystone 2 using register variables 21910269.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 2706.7 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 2541.2 lps (29.6 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 513224.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 130562.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1274668.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 1135625.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 196304.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 9083.5 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 4050.7 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 936.9 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 1466029.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 21910269.0 1877.5
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2706.7 492.1
Execl Throughput 43.0 2541.2 591.0
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 513224.5 1296.0
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 130562.0 788.9
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1274668.6 2197.7
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1135625.5 912.9
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 196304.3 490.8
Process Creation 126.0 9083.5 720.9
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 4050.7 955.4
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 936.9 1561.5
System Call Overhead 15000.0 1466029.5 977.4
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 955.3————————————————————————
Benchmark Run: Fri Apr 03 2015 17:35:58 – 18:04:30
2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of testsDhrystone 2 using register variables 43421870.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 5402.3 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 6842.8 lps (29.5 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 744282.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 223665.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1934280.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 2312941.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 390905.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 15406.7 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 7378.1 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1015.6 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 2150234.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 43421870.5 3720.8
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 5402.3 982.2
Execl Throughput 43.0 6842.8 1591.3
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 744282.4 1879.5
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 223665.2 1351.5
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1934280.4 3335.0
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 2312941.1 1859.3
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 390905.9 977.3
Process Creation 126.0 15406.7 1222.8
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 7378.1 1740.1
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1015.6 1692.7
System Call Overhead 15000.0 2150234.9 1433.5
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1667.5
路由跟踪：
通过的路由节点越少，说明你到VPS的通信阻力越少
通过最多 30 个跃点跟踪到 应MJJ要求隐藏之 的路由
1 <1 毫秒 <1 毫秒 <1 毫秒 192.168.1.1
2 307 ms 871 ms 614 ms 10.123.8.1
3 697 ms 869 ms 559 ms 10.123.8.1
4 142 ms 67 ms 24 ms 61.175.72.152
5 65 ms 46 ms 40 ms 61.175.73.29
6 22 ms 23 ms 23 ms 202.97.55.21
7 25 ms 27 ms 25 ms 202.97.33.78
8 * 26 ms 26 ms 202.97.33.190
9 143 ms 57 ms 22 ms 202.97.60.93
10 * * 63 ms 202.97.5.22
11 106 ms 99 ms 68 ms 112.174.83.233
12 * 184 ms 149 ms 112.174.48.61
13 71 ms 72 ms 80 ms 218.145.33.198
14 131 ms * 133 ms 112.190.34.178
15 73 ms 83 ms 83 ms 119.196.0.78
16 210 ms * * 210.92.18.254
17 148 ms 104 ms 100 ms 210.92.18.54
18 74 ms 68 ms 67 ms 应MJJ要求隐藏之
未经允许不得转载：啊福主机 » StarryDNS星光互联韩国VPS评测
神父提测：ethernetservers 评测
ExpertVM 评测
