LOCVPS是一家国人VPS提供商,提供了基于XEN和OpenVZ架构的VPS,数据中心在美国和香港,到大陆速度优秀。相关优惠报道请看本站文章。。目前这货,有67.5元的香港,性价比非常高,值得搞搞。下面让我们来看看我们这次的评测目标把。
CPU:2核心
内存:1G
硬盘:20G
流量:2M不限
IPs:1IPv4
架构:XEN
可选系统:linux
套餐:香港1024-p
下面让我们开始评测把
测试项目一:
CPU信息:
CPU核心数量的多少代表着你多线程运行的程序的快慢。当然性能不是绝对有优势的,看卖家把U平分到多少个人头上。不过一般来说U核心越多,性能越好。
[root@pn ~]# cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 45
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 0 @ 2.00GHz
stepping : 7
cpu MHz : 1999.999
cache size : 15360 KB
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 13
wp : yes
flags : fpu de tsc msr pae cx8 sep cmov pat clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht syscall nx lm rep_good unfair_spinlock pni pclmulqdq ssse3 cx16 pcid sse4_1 sse4_2 x2apic popcnt tsc_deadline_timer aes avx hypervisor lahf_lm
bogomips : 3999.99
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 46 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:processor : 1
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 45
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 0 @ 2.00GHz
stepping : 7
cpu MHz : 1999.999
cache size : 15360 KB
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 13
wp : yes
flags : fpu de tsc msr pae cx8 sep cmov pat clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht syscall nx lm rep_good unfair_spinlock pni pclmulqdq ssse3 cx16 pcid sse4_1 sse4_2 x2apic popcnt tsc_deadline_timer aes avx hypervisor lahf_lm
bogomips : 3999.99
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 46 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:
大母鸡啊~~
测试项目二:
空载内存信息:
内存是一个VPS最重要的部分之一。显然内存越大能够运行的程序越多,能够承载的访问量也越多。
[root@pn ~]# free -m
total used free shared buffers cached
Mem: 992 100 891 0 16 34
-/+ buffers/cache: 50 941
Swap: 255 0 255
CentOS 6的,未经优化,显然。
硬盘:
[root@pn ~]# df -h
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/xvda1 20G 853M 18G 5% /
none 497M 0 497M 0% /dev/shm
solusvm显然不会分系统盘和数据盘。不过酱紫也好,空间能好好利用起来。(很多人不会LVM挂载。)
测试项目三:
硬盘IO测试:
DD测试硬盘
[root@pn ~]# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=128k count=4k oflag=dsync
4096+0 records in
4096+0 records out
536870912 bytes (537 MB) copied, 7.53528 s, 71.2 MB/s
[root@pn ~]# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=128k count=4k oflag=dsync
4096+0 records in
4096+0 records out
536870912 bytes (537 MB) copied, 6.28691 s, 85.4 MB/s
[root@pn ~]# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=128k count=4k oflag=dsync
4096+0 records in
4096+0 records out
536870912 bytes (537 MB) copied, 5.54681 s, 96.8 MB/s
hdparm专用测试软件测试硬盘。
[root@pn dev]# hdparm -t /dev/xvda1
/dev/xvda1:
Timing buffered disk reads: 588 MB in 3.01 seconds = 195.46 MB/sec
[root@pn dev]# hdparm -t /dev/xvda1/dev/xvda1:
Timing buffered disk reads: 506 MB in 3.00 seconds = 168.55 MB/sec
[root@pn dev]# hdparm -t /dev/xvda1/dev/xvda1:
Timing buffered disk reads: 638 MB in 3.00 seconds = 212.55 MB/sec
性能还不错
测试项目四:
端口速率:
Port Speed
IN速率:
[root@pn dev]# wget -c http://dldir1.qq.com/qqfile/qq/QQ5.3/10702/QQ5.3.exe
–2014-04-15 21:56:48– http://dldir1.qq.com/qqfile/qq/QQ5.3/10702/QQ5.3.exe
Resolving dldir1.qq.com… 58.216.25.25, 61.160.230.25, 58.216.25.26, …
Connecting to dldir1.qq.com|58.216.25.25|:80… connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response… 200 OK
Length: 58336440 (56M) [application/octet-stream]
Saving to: `QQ5.3.exe’100%[=================================>] 58,336,440 244K/s in 10m 7s
2014-04-15 22:06:56 (93.8 KB/s) – `QQ5.3.exe’ saved [58336440/58336440]
平均in仅有93K 1M多的带宽。
OUT 速率测试
采用阿里云(官网:http://www.aliyun.com )的杭州数据中心测试下载速度。
[root@aliyun~]#wget http://122.10.113.6/QQ5.3.exe
–2014-04-15 22:12:03– http://122.10.113.6/QQ5.3.exe
Connecting to 122.10.113.6:80… connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response… 200 OK
Length: 58336440 (56M) [application/octet-stream]
Saving to: `QQ5.3.exe’100%[=====================================>] 58,336,440 569K/s in 5m 16s
2014-04-15 22:17:19 (180 KB/s) – `QQ5.3.exe’ saved [58336440/58336440]
出带宽略低于2M 。效果还不错。
测试项目五:
UnixBench Score
Unixbench跑分:400以下为性能低下400-600正常水平,高于1K性能优异。如果朋友们遇到Unixbench跑分出错的问题,欢迎查找:Unixbench 测试脚本错误集锦
wget http://byte-unixbench.googlecode.com/files/unixbench-5.1.3.tgz
tar zxvf unixbench-5.1.3.tgz
cd unixbench-5.1.3
make
./Run
# # # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # #
# # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # # #
# # # # # # ## ##### ##### # # # # ######
# # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # #
# # # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # #
#### # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # #Version 5.1.2 Based on the Byte Magazine Unix Benchmark
Multi-CPU version Version 5 revisions by Ian Smith,
Sunnyvale, CA, USA
December 22, 2007 johantheghost at yahoo period com1 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Double-Precision Whetstone 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Execl Throughput 1 2 3
1 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1 2 3
1 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1 2 3
1 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1 2 3
1 x Pipe Throughput 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Pipe-based Context Switching 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Process Creation 1 2 3
1 x System Call Overhead 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1 2 3
1 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1 2 3
2 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
2 x Double-Precision Whetstone 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
2 x Execl Throughput 1 2 3
2 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1 2 3
2 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1 2 3
2 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1 2 3
2 x Pipe Throughput 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
2 x Pipe-based Context Switching 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
2 x Process Creation 1 2 3
2 x System Call Overhead 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
2 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1 2 3
2 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1 2 3
========================================================================
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.2)System: pn.rffan.com: GNU/Linux
OS: GNU/Linux — 2.6.32-358.0.1.el6.x86_64 — #1 SMP Wed Feb 27 06:06:45 UTC 2013
Machine: x86_64 (x86_64)
Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap=”UTF-8″, collate=”UTF-8″)
CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 0 @ 2.00GHz (4000.0 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET
CPU 1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 0 @ 2.00GHz (4000.0 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET
22:23:43 up 1:52, 1 user, load average: 0.20, 0.11, 0.03; runlevel 3————————————————————————
Benchmark Run: Tue Apr 15 2014 22:23:43 – 22:51:41
2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of testsDhrystone 2 using register variables 19190245.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 2190.7 MWIPS (9.8 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 788.4 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 121853.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 31797.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 400552.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 191770.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 34217.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 1660.5 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1874.1 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 350.2 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 197448.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 19190245.7 1644.4
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2190.7 398.3
Execl Throughput 43.0 788.4 183.3
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 121853.0 307.7
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 31797.0 192.1
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 400552.8 690.6
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 191770.8 154.2
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 34217.6 85.5
Process Creation 126.0 1660.5 131.8
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 1874.1 442.0
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 350.2 583.7
System Call Overhead 15000.0 197448.9 131.6
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 285.2————————————————————————
Benchmark Run: Tue Apr 15 2014 22:51:41 – 23:19:38
2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of testsDhrystone 2 using register variables 39043180.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 4430.1 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 1637.3 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 204314.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 53264.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 702280.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 392632.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 67144.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 3188.9 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 2752.5 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 370.2 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 375418.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 39043180.2 3345.6
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 4430.1 805.5
Execl Throughput 43.0 1637.3 380.8
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 204314.4 515.9
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 53264.6 321.8
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 702280.5 1210.8
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 392632.3 315.6
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 67144.7 167.9
Process Creation 126.0 3188.9 253.1
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 2752.5 649.2
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 370.2 616.9
System Call Overhead 15000.0 375418.2 250.3
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 505.3
测试项目六:
Ping From China
ping值测试
- 序号
- Ping的地点
- 响应IP
- 响应时间
- TTL
- 赞助商
- 1
- 云南昆明[电信]
- 122.10.113.6
- 54毫秒
- 51
- 云南蓝队网络
- 2
- 四川遂宁[电信]
- 122.10.113.6
- 56毫秒
- 50
- 双线租用200元月起
- 3
- 上海[电信]
- 122.10.113.6
- 32毫秒
- 52
- ★香港★双线免备案
- 4
- 湖南[电信]
- 122.10.113.6
- 16毫秒
- 51
- 【高防服务器】免备案
- 5
- 陕西西安[电信]
- 122.10.113.6
- 48毫秒
- 50
- 中光电信云vps
- 6
- 江苏无锡[电信]
- 122.10.113.6
- 29毫秒
- 49
- 山西太原联通机房
- 7
- 深圳[电信]
- 122.10.113.6
- 9毫秒
- 50
- 香港纵横网连
- 8
- 四川成都[电信]
- 122.10.113.6
- 50毫秒
- 51
- 西部数码 云主机
- 9
- 江苏扬州[电信]
- 122.10.113.6
- 33毫秒
- 50
- DiyVM高端云VPS
- 10
- 广东东莞[电信]
- 122.10.113.6
- 10毫秒
- 50
- ★迅美★东莞高防149
- 11
- 江西[多线]
- 122.10.113.6
- 39毫秒
- 48
- 【高防免备】无视CC
- 12
- 广东[多线]
- 122.10.113.6
- 14毫秒
- 51
- 新浪潮高防秒解300G
- 13
- 郑州[多线]
- 122.10.113.6
- 43毫秒
- 48
- 【易米BGP】 云VPS
- 14
- 浙江[多线]
- 122.10.113.6
- 35毫秒
- 48
- 45互联免备VPS 50元
- 15
- 洛阳[多线]
- 122.10.113.6
- 46毫秒
- 48
- ★迅美★BGP5线109元
- 16
- 北京[多线]
- 122.10.113.6
- 50毫秒
- 47
- 北京BGP【免备】
- 17
- 上海[多线]
- 122.10.113.6
- 36毫秒
- 47
- 浦东数据中心(BGP)
- 18
- 安徽滁州[联通]
- 122.10.113.6
- 54毫秒
- 48
- (海外高防专家)
- 19
- 上海[联通]
- 122.10.113.6
- 46毫秒
- 51
- 上海络安数据中心
- 20
- 黑龙江[联通]
- 122.10.113.6
- 69毫秒
- 47
- 45互联高防免备服务器
- 21
- 深圳[联通]
- 122.10.113.6
- 12毫秒
- 49
- 香港纵横网连
- 22
- 徐州[联通]
- 122.10.113.6
- 46毫秒
- 47
- 枫信江苏双线399/月
- 23
- 泉州[联通]
- 122.10.113.6
- 42毫秒
- 49
- 三千尺-百兆独享
- 24
- 江苏[联通]
- 122.10.113.6
- 45毫秒
- 50
- 蒲公英100M独享
- 25
- 天津[联通]
- 122.10.113.6
- 46毫秒
- 46
- 免备案主机 云主机
- 26
- 安徽[移动]
- 122.10.113.6
- 39毫秒
- 48
- 香港润网 vps母鸡
- 27
- 深圳[移动]
- 122.10.113.6
- 21毫秒
- 48
- 香港纵横网连
- 28
- 美国圣安娜[海外]
- 122.10.113.6
- 153毫秒
- 55
- 美国KT高速服务器
- 29
- 荷兰[海外]
- 122.10.113.6
- 261毫秒
- 51
- ComVps|国外云主机
- 30
- 英国[海外]
- 122.10.113.6
- 261毫秒
- 55
- 国外百兆独服499元
- 31
- 台湾[海外]
- 122.10.113.6
- 31毫秒
- 46
- 海西数据台湾机房
- 32
- 韩国[海外]
- 122.10.113.6
- 88毫秒
- 50
- 【打不死】高防服务器
- 33
- 美国迈阿密[海外]
- 122.10.113.6
- 183毫秒
- 52
- 全球资源|星王科技
- 34
- 美国洛杉矶[海外]
- 122.10.113.6
- 150毫秒
- 54
- 快易互联
- 35
- 美国圣何塞[海外]
- 122.10.113.6
- 162毫秒
- 51
- EMSHOST 云主机
- 36
- 日本[海外]
- 122.10.113.6
- 60毫秒
- 49
- 【无视CC流量攻击】
- 37
- 香港[海外]
- 122.10.113.6
- 6毫秒
- 53
- 香港【双线】稳定
未经允许不得转载:啊福主机 » LOCVPS 香港数据中心评测