LOCVPS 香港数据中心评测-啊福主机

LOCVPS是一家国人VPS提供商，提供了基于XEN和OpenVZ架构的VPS，数据中心在美国和香港，到大陆速度优秀。相关优惠报道请看本站文章。。目前这货，有67.5元的香港，性价比非常高，值得搞搞。下面让我们来看看我们这次的评测目标把。

CPU：2核心

内存：1G

硬盘：20G

流量：2M不限

IPs：1IPv4

架构：XEN

可选系统：linux

套餐：香港1024-p

官方网址：http://www.locvps.net

下面让我们开始评测把

测试项目一：

CPU信息：

CPU核心数量的多少代表着你多线程运行的程序的快慢。当然性能不是绝对有优势的，看卖家把U平分到多少个人头上。不过一般来说U核心越多，性能越好。

[root@pn ~]# cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor   : 0
vendor_id   : GenuineIntel
cpu family   : 6
model       : 45
model name   : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 0 @ 2.00GHz
stepping   : 7
cpu MHz       : 1999.999
cache size   : 15360 KB
fpu       : yes
fpu_exception   : yes
cpuid level   : 13
wp       : yes
flags       : fpu de tsc msr pae cx8 sep cmov pat clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht syscall nx lm rep_good unfair_spinlock pni pclmulqdq ssse3 cx16 pcid sse4_1 sse4_2 x2apic popcnt tsc_deadline_timer aes avx hypervisor lahf_lm
bogomips   : 3999.99
clflush size   : 64
cache_alignment   : 64
address sizes   : 46 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:

processor   : 1
vendor_id   : GenuineIntel
cpu family   : 6
model       : 45
model name   : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 0 @ 2.00GHz
stepping   : 7
cpu MHz       : 1999.999
cache size   : 15360 KB
fpu       : yes
fpu_exception   : yes
cpuid level   : 13
wp       : yes
flags       : fpu de tsc msr pae cx8 sep cmov pat clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht syscall nx lm rep_good unfair_spinlock pni pclmulqdq ssse3 cx16 pcid sse4_1 sse4_2 x2apic popcnt tsc_deadline_timer aes avx hypervisor lahf_lm
bogomips   : 3999.99
clflush size   : 64
cache_alignment   : 64
address sizes   : 46 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:

大母鸡啊~~

测试项目二：

空载内存信息：

内存是一个VPS最重要的部分之一。显然内存越大能够运行的程序越多，能够承载的访问量也越多。

[root@pn ~]# free -m
total       used       free     shared    buffers     cached
Mem:           992        100        891          0         16         34
-/+ buffers/cache:         50        941
Swap:          255          0        255

CentOS 6的，未经优化，显然。

硬盘：

[root@pn ~]# df -h
Filesystem            Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/xvda1             20G 853M   18G   5% /
none                  497M     0 497M   0% /dev/shm

solusvm显然不会分系统盘和数据盘。不过酱紫也好，空间能好好利用起来。（很多人不会LVM挂载。）

测试项目三：

硬盘IO测试：

DD测试硬盘

[root@pn ~]# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=128k count=4k oflag=dsync
4096+0 records in
4096+0 records out
536870912 bytes (537 MB) copied, 7.53528 s, 71.2 MB/s
[root@pn ~]# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=128k count=4k oflag=dsync
4096+0 records in
4096+0 records out
536870912 bytes (537 MB) copied, 6.28691 s, 85.4 MB/s
[root@pn ~]# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=128k count=4k oflag=dsync
4096+0 records in
4096+0 records out
536870912 bytes (537 MB) copied, 5.54681 s, 96.8 MB/s

hdparm专用测试软件测试硬盘。

[root@pn dev]# hdparm -t /dev/xvda1

/dev/xvda1:
Timing buffered disk reads: 588 MB in 3.01 seconds = 195.46 MB/sec
[root@pn dev]# hdparm -t /dev/xvda1

/dev/xvda1:
Timing buffered disk reads: 506 MB in 3.00 seconds = 168.55 MB/sec
[root@pn dev]# hdparm -t /dev/xvda1

/dev/xvda1:
Timing buffered disk reads: 638 MB in 3.00 seconds = 212.55 MB/sec

性能还不错

测试项目四：

端口速率：

Port Speed

IN速率：

[root@pn dev]# wget -c http://dldir1.qq.com/qqfile/qq/QQ5.3/10702/QQ5.3.exe
–2014-04-15 21:56:48– http://dldir1.qq.com/qqfile/qq/QQ5.3/10702/QQ5.3.exe
Resolving dldir1.qq.com… 58.216.25.25, 61.160.230.25, 58.216.25.26, …
Connecting to dldir1.qq.com|58.216.25.25|:80… connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response… 200 OK
Length: 58336440 (56M) [application/octet-stream]
Saving to: `QQ5.3.exe’

100%[=================================>] 58,336,440 244K/s in 10m 7s

2014-04-15 22:06:56 (93.8 KB/s) – `QQ5.3.exe’ saved [58336440/58336440]

平均in仅有93K 1M多的带宽。

OUT 速率测试

采用阿里云（官网：http://www.aliyun.com ）的杭州数据中心测试下载速度。

[root@aliyun~]#wget http://122.10.113.6/QQ5.3.exe
–2014-04-15 22:12:03– http://122.10.113.6/QQ5.3.exe
Connecting to 122.10.113.6:80… connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response… 200 OK
Length: 58336440 (56M) [application/octet-stream]
Saving to: `QQ5.3.exe’

100%[=====================================>] 58,336,440 569K/s in 5m 16s

2014-04-15 22:17:19 (180 KB/s) – `QQ5.3.exe’ saved [58336440/58336440]

出带宽略低于2M 。效果还不错。

测试项目五：

UnixBench Score

Unixbench跑分:400以下为性能低下400-600正常水平，高于1K性能优异。如果朋友们遇到Unixbench跑分出错的问题，欢迎查找：Unixbench 测试脚本错误集锦

wget http://byte-unixbench.googlecode.com/files/unixbench-5.1.3.tgz

tar zxvf unixbench-5.1.3.tgz

cd unixbench-5.1.3

make

./Run

#    # #    # # #    #          #####   ###### #    #   ####   #    #
#    # ##   # #   # #           #    # #       ##   # #    # #    #
#    # # # # #    ##            #####   #####   # # # #       ######
#    # # # # #    ##            #    # #       # # # #       #    #
#    # #   ## #   # #           #    # #       #   ## #    # #    #
####   #    # # #    #          #####   ###### #    #   ####   #    #

Version 5.1.2                      Based on the Byte Magazine Unix Benchmark

Multi-CPU version                  Version 5 revisions by Ian Smith,
Sunnyvale, CA, USA
December 22, 2007                  johantheghost at yahoo period com

1 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Double-Precision Whetstone 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Execl Throughput 1 2 3

1 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1 2 3

1 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1 2 3

1 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1 2 3

1 x Pipe Throughput 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Pipe-based Context Switching 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Process Creation 1 2 3

1 x System Call Overhead 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1 2 3

1 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1 2 3

2 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

2 x Double-Precision Whetstone 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

2 x Execl Throughput 1 2 3

2 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1 2 3

2 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1 2 3

2 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1 2 3

2 x Pipe Throughput 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

2 x Pipe-based Context Switching 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

2 x Process Creation 1 2 3

2 x System Call Overhead 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

2 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1 2 3

2 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1 2 3

========================================================================
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.2)

System: pn.rffan.com: GNU/Linux
OS: GNU/Linux — 2.6.32-358.0.1.el6.x86_64 — #1 SMP Wed Feb 27 06:06:45 UTC 2013
Machine: x86_64 (x86_64)
Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap=”UTF-8″, collate=”UTF-8″)
CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 0 @ 2.00GHz (4000.0 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET
CPU 1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 0 @ 2.00GHz (4000.0 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET
22:23:43 up 1:52, 1 user, load average: 0.20, 0.11, 0.03; runlevel 3

————————————————————————
Benchmark Run: Tue Apr 15 2014 22:23:43 – 22:51:41
2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables       19190245.7 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                     2190.7 MWIPS (9.8 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                                788.4 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        121853.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks           31797.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks        400552.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                              191770.8 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                  34217.6 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                               1660.5 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   1874.1 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                    350.2 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                         197448.9 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   19190245.7   1644.4
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       2190.7    398.3
Execl Throughput                                 43.0        788.4    183.3
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     121853.0    307.7
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0      31797.0    192.1
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0     400552.8    690.6
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0     191770.8    154.2
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0      34217.6     85.5
Process Creation                                126.0       1660.5    131.8
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4       1874.1    442.0
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0        350.2    583.7
System Call Overhead                          15000.0     197448.9    131.6
========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                         285.2

————————————————————————
Benchmark Run: Tue Apr 15 2014 22:51:41 – 23:19:38
2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables       39043180.2 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                     4430.1 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                               1637.3 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        204314.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks           53264.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks        702280.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                              392632.3 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                  67144.7 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                               3188.9 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   2752.5 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                    370.2 lpm   (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                         375418.2 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   39043180.2   3345.6
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       4430.1    805.5
Execl Throughput                                 43.0       1637.3    380.8
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     204314.4    515.9
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0      53264.6    321.8
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0     702280.5   1210.8
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0     392632.3    315.6
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0      67144.7    167.9
Process Creation                                126.0       3188.9    253.1
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4       2752.5    649.2
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0        370.2    616.9
System Call Overhead                          15000.0     375418.2    250.3
========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                         505.3