这货是华为搞的云主机。目的么，当然是来分一杯羹了。效果么，目前还不晓得效果如何。
测试配置：
CPU：2核心
内存：2G
硬盘：100G （40G 系统，以及60G 需要自行挂载）
流量：2M不限
IPs：1IPv4（双线带宽的话，会配备2个IP。）
架构：xen -hvm（这货是xen的全虚拟化。支持windows。好吧，windows要交钱的。咱们能自己虚拟么？）（不知道linux VPS的架构？点击查看教程）
可选系统：各种Linux 64位。为何没32位！！！
官方网址：www.hwclouds.com
测试项目一：
CPU信息
cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 44
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5645 @ 2.40GHz
stepping : 2
cpu MHz : 2400.141
cache size : 12288 KB
physical id : 0
siblings : 1
core id : 0
cpu cores : 1
apicid : 0
initial apicid : 0
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 11
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic mtrr pge mca cmov pat clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ht syscall nx lm rep_good unfair_spinlock pni ssse3 cx16 sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt aes hypervisor lahf_lm
bogomips : 4800.28
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:
processor : 1
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 44
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5645 @ 2.40GHz
stepping : 2
cpu MHz : 2400.141
cache size : 12288 KB
physical id : 2
siblings : 1
core id : 0
cpu cores : 1
apicid : 2
initial apicid : 2
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 11
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic mtrr pge mca cmov pat clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ht syscall nx lm rep_good unfair_spinlock pni ssse3 cx16 sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt aes hypervisor lahf_lm
bogomips : 4799.66
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:
测试项目二：
空载内存信息：
total used free shared buffers cached
Mem: 1872 1576 295 0 65 1362
-/+ buffers/cache: 148 1723
Swap: 4095 0 4095
使用内存148M 。。。果然不亏为64位的系统啊。
硬盘空间：
[root@localhost ~]# df -h
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/xvda2 36G 5.3G 29G 16% /
tmpfs 939M 0 939M 0% /dev/shm
这个空间也坑爹。那天下午问华为的客服为何他们少了4G的空间的时候，他们的回答是。他们的G是采用1000进制的，不是1024进制的。。所以，坑爹把。硬盘还有60G没挂载，不过看看阿福的教程应该就能够轻松解决了把：linux将没有格式化的硬盘以ext3格式挂载
测试项目三：
硬盘IO测试：
[root@localhost ~]# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=512k count=4k oflag=dsync
4096+0 records in
4096+0 records out
2147483648 bytes (2.1 GB) copied, 160.027 s, 13.4 MB/s
[root@localhost ~]# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=512k count=4k oflag=dsync
4096+0 records in
4096+0 records out
2147483648 bytes (2.1 GB) copied, 161.099 s, 13.3 MB/s
[root@localhost ~]# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=512k count=4k oflag=dsync
4096+0 records in
4096+0 records out
2147483648 bytes (2.1 GB) copied, 169.862 s, 12.6 MB/s
IO是坑爹货，索性这次是华为送的阿福，不是阿福买的。。
测试项目四：
端口速率：
[root@localhost ~]# wget http://dldir1.qq.com/qqfile/qq/QQ2013/QQ2013SP6/9284/QQ2013SP6.exe
–2013-12-27 21:41:14– http://dldir1.qq.com/qqfile/qq/QQ2013/QQ2013SP6/9284/QQ2013SP6.exe
Resolving dldir1.qq.com… 119.167.143.141, 119.167.143.142, 182.118.37.31, …
Connecting to dldir1.qq.com|119.167.143.141|:80… connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response… 200 OK
Length: 59391672 (57M) [application/octet-stream]
Saving to: “QQ2013SP6.exe”
100%[===========================>] 59,391,672 235K/s in 4m 10s
2013-12-27 21:45:24 (232 KB/s) – “QQ2013SP6.exe” saved [59391672/59391672]
话说华为也太抠了，实在是死死的扣住进出口，进口也是2M。
然后蛋疼的要死。开始的时候阿福的测试机没进白名单，一切很OK。。然后，这货就没有然后了，当时测试的时候进出口都是2M。
测试项目五：
Unixbench跑分:400以下为性能低下400-600正常水平，高于1K性能优异。如果朋友们遇到Unixbench跑分出错的问题，欢迎查找：Unixbench 测试脚本错误集锦
# # # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # #
# # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # # #
# # # # # # ## ##### ##### # # # # ######
# # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # #
# # # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # #
#### # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # #
Version 5.1.2 Based on the Byte Magazine Unix Benchmark
Multi-CPU version Version 5 revisions by Ian Smith,
Sunnyvale, CA, USA
December 22, 2007 johantheghost at yahoo period com
1 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Double-Precision Whetstone 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Execl Throughput 1 2 3
1 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1 2 3
1 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1 2 3
1 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1 2 3
1 x Pipe Throughput 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Pipe-based Context Switching 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Process Creation 1 2 3
1 x System Call Overhead 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1 2 3
1 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1 2 3
2 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
2 x Double-Precision Whetstone 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
2 x Execl Throughput 1 2 3
2 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1 2 3
2 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1 2 3
2 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1 2 3
2 x Pipe Throughput 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
2 x Pipe-based Context Switching 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
2 x Process Creation 1 2 3
2 x System Call Overhead 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
2 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1 2 3
2 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1 2 3
========================================================================
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.2)
System: localhost.localdomain: GNU/Linux
OS: GNU/Linux — 2.6.32-279.el6.x86_64 — #1 SMP Fri Jun 22 12:19:21 UTC 2012
Machine: x86_64 (x86_64)
Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap=”UTF-8″, collate=”UTF-8″)
CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5645 @ 2.40GHz (4800.3 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET
CPU 1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5645 @ 2.40GHz (4799.7 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET
22:19:58 up 1 day, 4:54, 2 users, load average: 0.34, 0.11, 0.03; runlevel 3
————————————————————————
Benchmark Run: Fri Dec 27 2013 22:19:59 – 22:48:16
2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 22898465.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 2870.3 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 2855.9 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 806193.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 224507.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1631788.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 1715425.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 279074.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 7588.5 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 4776.3 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1062.5 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 3251121.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 22898465.9 1962.2
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2870.3 521.9
Execl Throughput 43.0 2855.9 664.2
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 806193.7 2035.8
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 224507.3 1356.5
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1631788.4 2813.4
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1715425.7 1379.0
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 279074.2 697.7
Process Creation 126.0 7588.5 602.3
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 4776.3 1126.5
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1062.5 1770.8
System Call Overhead 15000.0 3251121.4 2167.4
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1240.2
————————————————————————
Benchmark Run: Fri Dec 27 2013 22:48:16 – 23:16:34
2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 45664097.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 5737.4 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 6335.4 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 462303.2 KBps (30.1 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 132044.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2300759.7 KBps (30.1 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 3429464.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 557365.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 22484.7 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 8378.6 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1144.1 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 5293550.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 45664097.7 3912.9
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 5737.4 1043.2
Execl Throughput 43.0 6335.4 1473.4
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 462303.2 1167.4
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 132044.4 797.9
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2300759.7 3966.8
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 3429464.2 2756.8
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 557365.6 1393.4
Process Creation 126.0 22484.7 1784.5
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 8378.6 1976.1
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1144.1 1906.8
System Call Overhead 15000.0 5293550.6 3529.0
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1886.0
其实阿福想说fuck IO这么低，跑分这么好！！！！
然后，ping阿福也懒的测试了。。。。反正国内就那样。。
神父提测：ethernetservers 评测
ExpertVM 评测
StarryDNS星光互联韩国VPS评测
