bandwagonhost 9.9美元每年凤凰城评测-啊福主机

这货的VPS曾经一度遭到疯抢，原因是这货有9.9美元年付的256M的VPS，这次阿福测试的也是这货的这款VPS。数据中心在凤凰城，到国内速度优秀。

配置：

CPU：1核心

内存：512M

硬盘：5G

流量：500G

IPs：1IPv4

架构：OpenVZ

可选系统：Linux

控制面板：自家开发的KiwiVM（蛋疼的是重装系统要先关机）

官方网址：www.bandwagonhost.com

测试项目一：

CPU信息：

CPU核心数量的多少代表着你多线程运行的程序的快慢。当然性能不是绝对有优势的，看卖家把U平分到多少个人头上。不过一般来说U核心越多，性能越好。

[root@default ~]# cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor   : 0
vendor_id   : GenuineIntel
cpu family   : 6
model       : 44
model name   : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU           L5639 @ 2.13GHz
stepping   : 2
cpu MHz       : 362.485
cache size   : 12288 KB
physical id   : 0
siblings   : 12
core id       : 0
cpu cores   : 6
apicid       : 0
initial apicid   : 0
fpu       : yes
fpu_exception   : yes
cpuid level   : 11
wp       : yes
flags       : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx pdpe1gb rdtscp lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good xtopology nonstop_tsc aperfmperf pni pclmulqdq dtes64 monitor ds_cpl vmx smx est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr pdcm pcid dca sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt aes lahf_lm ida arat epb dts tpr_shadow vnmi flexpriority ept vpid
bogomips   : 4266.49
clflush size   : 64
cache_alignment   : 64
address sizes   : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:

测试项目二：

空载内存信息：

内存是一个VPS最重要的部分之一。显然内存越大能够运行的程序越多，能够承载的访问量也越多。

Ram Usage of Newly Installed VPS
[root@default ~]# free -m
total       used       free     shared    buffers     cached
Mem:           512         28        483          0          0         16
-/+ buffers/cache:         12        499
Swap:          512          0        512

硬盘：

Disk Usage of Newly Installed VPS

[root@default ~]# df -h
Filesystem            Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/simfs            5.0G 513M 4.5G 11% /
none                  256M 8.0K 256M   1% /dev

测试项目三：

硬盘IO测试：

DD测试硬盘

[root@default ~]# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=128k count=4k oflag=dsync
4096+0 records in
4096+0 records out
536870912 bytes (537 MB) copied, 3.37456 seconds, 159 MB/s
[root@default ~]# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=128k count=4k oflag=dsync
4096+0 records in
4096+0 records out
536870912 bytes (537 MB) copied, 3.59998 seconds, 149 MB/s
[root@default ~]# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=128k count=4k oflag=dsync
4096+0 records in
4096+0 records out
536870912 bytes (537 MB) copied, 3.41284 seconds, 157 MB/s

测试项目四：

端口速率：

Port Speed

IN速率：

[root@default ~]# wget http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test
–2013-12-10 00:41:55– http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test
Resolving cachefly.cachefly.net… 205.234.175.175
Connecting to cachefly.cachefly.net|205.234.175.175|:80… connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response… 200 OK
Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/octet-stream]
Saving to: `100mb.test’

100%[============================================================>] 104,857,600 40.7M/s in 2.5s

2013-12-10 00:41:58 (40.7 MB/s) – `100mb.test’ saved [104857600/104857600]

G口！

OUT 速率

采用MYHOST123（官网：http://www.myhost123.com ）的凤凰城数据中心测试下载速度。

[root@myhost123 ~]#wget http://神父说屏蔽的/100mb.test
–2013-12-10 01:26:56– http://神父说屏蔽的/100mb.test
Connecting to 神父说屏蔽的:80… connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response… 200 OK
Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/x-tar]
Saving to: `100mb.test.3′

100%[============================================================>] 104,857,600 4.37M/s   in 25s

2013-12-10 01:27:21 (4.01 MB/s) – `100mb.test.3′ saved [104857600/104857600]
采用GetVM洛杉矶ENZU数据中心（官网：http://www.getvm.net）测试下载速度。

[root@GetVM1200 ~]# wget http://神父说屏蔽的/100mb.test
–2013-12-10 14:20:53– http://神父说屏蔽的/100mb.test
Connecting to 神父说屏蔽的:80… connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response… 200 OK
Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/x-tar]
Saving to: `100mb.test.7′

100%[============================================================>] 104,857,600 2.84M/s   in 57s

2013-12-10 14:21:50 (1.76 MB/s) – `100mb.test.7′ saved [104857600/104857600]
采用XsVPS的洛杉矶数据中心（官网：http://xsvps.com）测试下载速度

[root@xsvps ~]# wget http://神父说屏蔽的/100mb.test
–2013-12-09 17:15:30– http://神父说屏蔽的/100mb.test
Connecting to 神父说屏蔽的:80… connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response… 200 OK
Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/x-tar]
Saving to: `100mb.test.4′

100%[============================================================>] 104,857,600 10.6M/s   in 9.7s

2013-12-09 17:15:40 (10.3 MB/s) – `100mb.test.4′ saved [104857600/104857600]

端口速度很满意。至少G的的，能够满速下载 100M口子的也能满速下载（PS：貌似GetVM的BV数据中心的带宽不够了？）

测试项目五：

UnixBench Score

Unixbench跑分:400以下为性能低下400-600正常水平，高于1K性能优异。如果朋友们遇到Unixbench跑分出错的问题，欢迎查找：Unixbench 测试脚本错误集锦

wget http://byte-unixbench.googlecode.com/files/unixbench-5.1.3.tgz

tar zxvf unixbench-5.1.3.tgz

cd unixbench-5.1.3

make

./Run
#    # #    # # #    #          #####   ###### #    #   ####   #    #
#    # ##   # #   # #           #    # #       ##   # #    # #    #
#    # # # # #    ##            #####   #####   # # # #       ######
#    # # # # #    ##            #    # #       # # # #       #    #
#    # #   ## #   # #           #    # #       #   ## #    # #    #
####   #    # # #    #          #####   ###### #    #   ####   #    #

Version 5.1.2                      Based on the Byte Magazine Unix Benchmark

Multi-CPU version                  Version 5 revisions by Ian Smith,
Sunnyvale, CA, USA
December 22, 2007                  johantheghost at yahoo period com

1 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Double-Precision Whetstone 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Execl Throughput 1 2 3

1 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1 2 3

1 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1 2 3

1 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1 2 3

1 x Pipe Throughput 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Pipe-based Context Switching 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Process Creation 1 2 3

1 x System Call Overhead 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1 2 3

1 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1 2 3

========================================================================
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.2)

System: default.hostname: GNU/Linux
OS: GNU/Linux — 2.6.32-042stab083.2 — #1 SMP Fri Nov 8 18:08:40 MSK 2013
Machine: i686 (i386)
Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap=”UTF-8″, collate=”UTF-8″)
CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU L5639 @ 2.13GHz (4266.5 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
01:56:45 up 12:01, 1 user, load average: 0.19, 0.29, 0.15; runlevel 3

————————————————————————
Benchmark Run: Tue Dec 10 2013 01:56:45 – 02:33:56
1 CPU in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables        1624267.0 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                     1922.9 MWIPS (10.1 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                                638.9 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks         96975.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks           27796.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks        208714.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                              228201.0 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                  33514.4 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                               1613.5 lps   (30.1 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                    635.4 lpm   (60.1 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                     90.4 lpm   (60.4 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                         359738.1 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0    1624267.0    139.2
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       1922.9    349.6
Execl Throughput                                 43.0        638.9    148.6
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0      96975.2    244.9
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0      27796.1    168.0
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0     208714.3    359.9
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0     228201.0    183.4
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0      33514.4     83.8
Process Creation                                126.0       1613.5    128.1
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4        635.4    149.9
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0         90.4    150.7
System Call Overhead                          15000.0     359738.1    239.8
========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                         179.8