RamNode是一家国外VPS提供商,提供了基于OpenVZ和KVM架构的VPS,数据中心在美国的西雅图和亚特兰大。其中西雅图到国内速度优秀。亚特兰大么,比其他的亚特兰大的机子到国内的速度要好,不过还比不上西雅图。
配置:
CPU:4核心
内存:1G
硬盘:150G
流量:3T
IPs:1IPv4 && 16 IPv6
可选系统:Linux
官方网址:http://ramnode.com
测试项目一:
CPU信息:
CPU核心数量的多少代表着你多线程运行的程序的快慢。当然性能不是绝对有优势的,看卖家把U平分到多少个人头上。不过一般来说U核心越多,性能越好。
CPU Info
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 45
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2630 0 @ 2.30GHz
stepping : 7
cpu MHz : 2300.094
cache size : 15360 KB
physical id : 0
siblings : 12
core id : 0
cpu cores : 6
apicid : 0
initial apicid : 0
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 13
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx pdpe1gb rdtscp lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good xtopology nonstop_tsc aperfmperf pni pclmulqdq dtes64 monitor ds_cpl vmx smx est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr pdcm pcid dca sse4_1 sse4_2 x2apic popcnt tsc_deadline_timer aes xsave avx lahf_lm ida arat epb xsaveopt pln pts dts tpr_shadow vnmi flexpriority ept vpid
bogomips : 4600.18
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 46 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:processor : 1
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 45
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2630 0 @ 2.30GHz
stepping : 7
cpu MHz : 2300.094
cache size : 15360 KB
physical id : 0
siblings : 12
core id : 1
cpu cores : 6
apicid : 2
initial apicid : 2
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 13
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx pdpe1gb rdtscp lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good xtopology nonstop_tsc aperfmperf pni pclmulqdq dtes64 monitor ds_cpl vmx smx est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr pdcm pcid dca sse4_1 sse4_2 x2apic popcnt tsc_deadline_timer aes xsave avx lahf_lm ida arat epb xsaveopt pln pts dts tpr_shadow vnmi flexpriority ept vpid
bogomips : 4600.18
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 46 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:processor : 2
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 45
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2630 0 @ 2.30GHz
stepping : 7
cpu MHz : 2300.094
cache size : 15360 KB
physical id : 0
siblings : 12
core id : 2
cpu cores : 6
apicid : 4
initial apicid : 4
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 13
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx pdpe1gb rdtscp lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good xtopology nonstop_tsc aperfmperf pni pclmulqdq dtes64 monitor ds_cpl vmx smx est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr pdcm pcid dca sse4_1 sse4_2 x2apic popcnt tsc_deadline_timer aes xsave avx lahf_lm ida arat epb xsaveopt pln pts dts tpr_shadow vnmi flexpriority ept vpid
bogomips : 4600.18
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 46 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:processor : 3
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 45
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2630 0 @ 2.30GHz
stepping : 7
cpu MHz : 2300.094
cache size : 15360 KB
physical id : 0
siblings : 12
core id : 3
cpu cores : 6
apicid : 6
initial apicid : 6
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 13
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx pdpe1gb rdtscp lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good xtopology nonstop_tsc aperfmperf pni pclmulqdq dtes64 monitor ds_cpl vmx smx est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr pdcm pcid dca sse4_1 sse4_2 x2apic popcnt tsc_deadline_timer aes xsave avx lahf_lm ida arat epb xsaveopt pln pts dts tpr_shadow vnmi flexpriority ept vpid
bogomips : 4600.18
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 46 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:
测试项目二:
空载内存信息:
内存是一个VPS最重要的部分之一。显然内存越大能够运行的程序越多,能够承载的访问量也越多。
Ram Usage of Newly Installed VPS
[root@ramnode ~]# free -m
total used free shared buffers cached
Mem: 1024 95 928 0 0 13
-/+ buffers/cache: 82 941
Swap: 1024 3 1020
硬盘:
Disk Usage of Newly Installed VPS
[root@ramnode ~]# df -h
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/simfs 150G 2.1G 147.9G 9% /
none 512M 4.0K 512M 1% /dev
测试项目三:
硬盘IO测试:
DD测试硬盘
[root@ramnode ~]# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=128k count=4k oflag=dsync
4096+0 records in
4096+0 records out
536870912 bytes (537 MB) copied, 2.97383 seconds, 181 MB/s
[root@ramnode ~]# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=128k count=4k oflag=dsync
4096+0 records in
4096+0 records out
536870912 bytes (537 MB) copied, 3.06758 seconds, 175 MB/s
[root@ramnode ~]# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=128k count=4k oflag=dsync
4096+0 records in
4096+0 records out
536870912 bytes (537 MB) copied, 2.83632 seconds, 189 MB/s
测试项目四:
端口速率:
Port Speed
IN速率:
[root@ramnode dev]# wget http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test
–2013-12-01 18:30:55– http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test
Resolving cachefly.cachefly.net… 205.234.175.175
Connecting to cachefly.cachefly.net|205.234.175.175|:80… connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response… 200 OK
Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/octet-stream]
Saving to: `100mb.test’100%[======================================>] 104,857,600 83.5M/s in 1.2s
2013-12-01 18:30:56 (83.5 MB/s) – `100mb.test’ saved [104857600/104857600]
进口非常优秀
OUT 速率:
采用MYHOST123(官网:http://www.myhost123.com )的凤凰城数据中心测试下载速度。
[root@myhost123 ~]#wget http://192.184.94.75/100mb.test
–2013-12-01 05:41:24– http://192.184.94.75/100mb.test
Connecting to 192.184.94.75:80… connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response… 200 OK
Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/octet-stream]
Saving to: `100mb.test.1′100%[======================================>] 104,857,600 5.36M/s in 26s
2013-12-01 05:41:50 (3.79 MB/s) – `100mb.test.1′ saved [104857600/104857600]
采用GetVM洛杉矶ENZU数据中心(官网:http://www.getvm.net)测试下载速度。[root@GetVM1200 ~]# wget http://192.184.94.75/100mb.test
–2013-12-01 18:44:31– http://192.184.94.75/100mb.test
Connecting to 192.184.94.75:80… connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response… 200 OK
Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/octet-stream]
Saving to: `100mb.test.5′100%[======================================>] 104,857,600 2.39M/s in 39s
2013-12-01 18:45:10 (2.53 MB/s) – `100mb.test.5′ saved [104857600/104857600]
采用XsVPS的洛杉矶数据中心(官网:http://xsvps.com)测试下载速度[root@xsvps ~]# wget http://192.184.94.75/100mb.test
–2013-11-30 21:42:20– http://192.184.94.75/100mb.test
Connecting to 192.184.94.75:80… connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response… 200 OK
Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/octet-stream]
Saving to: `100mb.test.1′100%[======================================>] 104,857,600 4.05M/s in 23s
2013-11-30 21:42:43 (4.44 MB/s) – `100mb.test.1′ saved [104857600/104857600]
貌似出口带宽被限制了。不过还行
测试项目五:
UnixBench Score
Unixbench跑分:400以下为性能低下400-600正常水平,高于1K性能优异。如果朋友们遇到Unixbench跑分出错的问题,欢迎查找:Unixbench 测试脚本错误集锦
wget http://byte-unixbench.googlecode.com/files/unixbench-5.1.3.tgz
tar zxvf unixbench-5.1.3.tgz
cd unixbench-5.1.3
make
./Run
# # # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # #
# # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # # #
# # # # # # ## ##### ##### # # # # ######
# # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # #
# # # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # #
#### # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # #Version 5.1.2 Based on the Byte Magazine Unix Benchmark
Multi-CPU version Version 5 revisions by Ian Smith,
Sunnyvale, CA, USA
December 22, 2007 johantheghost at yahoo period com1 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Double-Precision Whetstone 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Execl Throughput 1 2 3
1 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1 2 3
1 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1 2 3
1 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1 2 3
1 x Pipe Throughput 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Pipe-based Context Switching 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Process Creation 1 2 3
1 x System Call Overhead 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1 2 3
1 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1 2 3
4 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
4 x Double-Precision Whetstone 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
4 x Execl Throughput 1 2 3
4 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1 2 3
4 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1 2 3
4 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1 2 3
4 x Pipe Throughput 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
4 x Pipe-based Context Switching 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
4 x Process Creation 1 2 3
4 x System Call Overhead 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
4 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1 2 3
4 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1 2 3
========================================================================
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.2)System: ramnode.hanvps.com: GNU/Linux
OS: GNU/Linux — 2.6.32-042stab081.3 — #1 SMP Mon Sep 9 20:07:47 MSK 2013
Machine: x86_64 (x86_64)
Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap=”UTF-8″, collate=”UTF-8″)
CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2630 0 @ 2.30GHz (4600.2 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2630 0 @ 2.30GHz (4600.2 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 2: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2630 0 @ 2.30GHz (4600.2 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 3: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2630 0 @ 2.30GHz (4600.2 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
18:50:09 up 26 days, 20:30, 1 user, load average: 0.10, 0.03, 0.00; runlevel 3————————————————————————
Benchmark Run: Sun Dec 01 2013 18:50:09 – 19:18:00
4 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of testsDhrystone 2 using register variables 14141579.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 2226.7 MWIPS (9.7 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 2268.3 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 404571.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 108507.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1039883.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 922245.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 93885.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 5734.6 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 3939.8 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1086.8 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 1298109.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 14141579.9 1211.8
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2226.7 404.9
Execl Throughput 43.0 2268.3 527.5
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 404571.8 1021.6
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 108507.0 655.6
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1039883.5 1792.9
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 922245.2 741.4
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 93885.2 234.7
Process Creation 126.0 5734.6 455.1
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 3939.8 929.2
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1086.8 1811.3
System Call Overhead 15000.0 1298109.3 865.4
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 757.8————————————————————————
Benchmark Run: Sun Dec 01 2013 19:18:00 – 19:46:00
4 CPUs in system; running 4 parallel copies of testsDhrystone 2 using register variables 43708817.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 8311.6 MWIPS (9.8 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 9592.9 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 372645.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 108119.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1189925.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 3287926.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 536107.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 17203.7 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 10818.8 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1557.0 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 2629031.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 43708817.3 3745.4
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 8311.6 1511.2
Execl Throughput 43.0 9592.9 2230.9
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 372645.2 941.0
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 108119.5 653.3
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1189925.6 2051.6
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 3287926.7 2643.0
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 536107.5 1340.3
Process Creation 126.0 17203.7 1365.4
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 10818.8 2551.6
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1557.0 2595.0
System Call Overhead 15000.0 2629031.2 1752.7
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1761.7
我敢说我一定是看花眼了。。。。这么高,好吧,不得不承认,VZ的特性,如果不超瘦确实可能有那么高
- 序号
- Ping的地点
- 响应IP
- 响应时间
- TTL
- 赞助商
- 1
- 安徽淮北[电信]
- 192.184.94.75
- 175毫秒
- 53
- 安徽拓普(双线)
- 2
- 江苏扬州[电信]
- 192.184.94.75
- 160毫秒
- 51
- DiyVM高端云VPS
- 3
- 香港[电信]
- 192.184.94.75
- 196毫秒
- 57
- 香港纵横网连
- 4
- 陕西西安[电信]
- 192.184.94.75
- 212毫秒
- 52
- 中光电信云vps
- 5
- 四川绵阳[电信]
- 192.184.94.75
- 303毫秒
- 52
- 西部数码 云主机
- 6
- 四川遂宁[电信]
- 192.184.94.75
- 241毫秒
- 53
- 双线租用200元月起
- 7
- 江苏镇江[电信]
- 192.184.94.75
- 207毫秒
- 51
- 雅科诺商务 [高防]
- 8
- 江西[电信]
- 192.184.94.75
- 176毫秒
- 52
- 【高防】广东【300G】
- 9
- 广东东莞[电信]
- 192.184.94.75
- 213毫秒
- 50
- BGP5线VPS109元
- 10
- 重庆[电信]
- 192.184.94.75
- 222毫秒
- 53
- 首页互联
- 11
- 云南昆明[电信]
- 192.184.94.75
- 223毫秒
- 52
- 云南数据港
- 12
- 深圳[电信]
- 192.184.94.75
- 198毫秒
- 51
- 香港纵横网连
- 13
- 四川德阳[电信]
- 192.184.94.75
- 224毫秒
- 51
- 加速乐防黑客
- 14
- 江苏无锡[电信]
- 192.184.94.75
- 163毫秒
- 50
- 山西太原联通机房
- 15
- 上海[电信]
- 192.184.94.75
- 155毫秒
- 52
- 上海龙联[上海高防]
- 16
- 上海[多线]
- 192.184.94.75
- 198毫秒
- 48
- 浦东数据中心(BGP)
- 17
- 北京[多线]
- 192.184.94.75
- 271毫秒
- 51
- 北京BGP【免备】
- 18
- 河南郑州[多线]
- 192.184.94.75
- 307毫秒
- 51
- 易米BGP 云主机
- 19
- 深圳[联通]
- 192.184.94.75
- 310毫秒
- 52
- 香港纵横网连
- 20
- 上海[联通]
- 192.184.94.75
- 186毫秒
- 53
- 上海络安数据中心
- 21
- 江苏[联通]
- 192.184.94.75
- 246毫秒
- 54
- 蒲公英100M独享
- 22
- 辽宁[联通]
- 192.184.94.75
- 243毫秒
- 54
- 【180G高防】秒解
- 23
- 黑龙江[联通]
- 192.184.94.75
- 256毫秒
- 50
- 45互联高防免备服务器
- 24
- 泉州[联通]
- 192.184.94.75
- 262毫秒
- 53
- 三千尺-百兆独享
- 25
- 安徽滁州[联通]
- 192.184.94.75
- 212毫秒
- 53
- (海外高防专家)
- 26
- 徐州[联通]
- 192.184.94.75
- 237毫秒
- 51
- 枫信江苏双线399/月
- 27
- 宁波[联通]
- 192.184.94.75
- 253毫秒
- 49
- 【高防】美国双线
- 28
- 天津[联通]
- 192.184.94.75
- 209毫秒
- 48
- 免备案主机 云主机
- 29
- 山东[移动]
- 192.184.94.75
- 233毫秒
- 45
- 新加坡VPS
- 30
- 深圳[移动]
- 192.184.94.75
- 202毫秒
- 47
- 香港纵横网连
- 31
- 安徽[移动]
- 192.184.94.75
- 232毫秒
- 44
- 香港润网 vps母鸡
- 32
- 江苏[移动]
- 192.184.94.75
- 239毫秒
- 43
- 蒲公英江苏多线
- 33
- 韩国[海外]
- 192.184.94.75
- 173毫秒
- 52
- 【打不死】高防服务器
- 34
- 加拿大[海外]
- 192.184.94.75
- 78毫秒
- 51
- 【海外双线】高防秒解
- 35
- 美国洛杉矶[海外]
- 192.184.94.75
- 28毫秒
- 55
- 快易互联
- 36
- 日本[海外]
- 192.184.94.75
- 127毫秒
- 52
- 国内免备案服务器
- 37
- 美国堪萨斯[海外]
- 192.184.94.75
- 58毫秒
- 54
- 奇浪网服务器VPS
- 38
- 香港[海外]
- 192.184.94.75
- 175毫秒
- 49
- 广东【180G】高防特价
- 39
- 美国圣安娜[海外]
- 192.184.94.75
- 32毫秒
- 56
- 美国KT高速服务器
- 40
- 美国圣何塞[海外]
- 192.184.94.75
- 19毫秒
- 54
- EMSHOST 云主机
- 41
- 英国[海外]
- 192.184.94.75
- 139毫秒
- 58
- 全球服务器租用
- 42
- 台湾[海外]
- 192.184.94.75
- 198毫秒
- 44
- 海西数据台湾机房
- 43
- 德国[海外]
- 192.184.94.75
- 155毫秒
- 56
- 全球服务器
- 44
- 美国迈阿密[海外]
- 192.184.94.75
- 32毫秒
- 54
- COMVPS 站群VPS
走的是nlayer的线路,没想到nlayer的西雅图线路现在居然这么好!
未经允许不得转载:啊福主机 » RamNode 西雅图OpenVZ 评测