PaulVPS是一家国人vps提供商,提供了基于xen和OpenVZ架构的vps。最近阿福从花伞菌 那边搞了他和罗伊搞基弄到的vps 嗯应该不算是罗伊的正规产品。但是性能么~还是那么的好,好了现在不多说了,阿福开始上评测。
样机配置:
CPU:4核心
内存:1G
swap:512M
硬盘:25G
流量:500G
IPs:1IPv4
架构:XenPV
测试项目一:
CPU信息
cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 58
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1270 V2 @ 3.50GHz
stepping : 9
cpu MHz : 3500.024
cache size : 8192 KB
fdiv_bug : no
hlt_bug : no
f00f_bug : no
coma_bug : no
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 13
wp : yes
flags : fpu de tsc msr pae cx8 sep cmov pat clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht nx unfair_spinlock pni pclmulqdq ssse3 pcid sse4_1 sse4_2 x2apic popcnt tsc_deadline_timer aes avx f16c rdrand hypervisor
bogomips : 7000.04
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 36 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:processor : 1
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 58
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1270 V2 @ 3.50GHz
stepping : 9
cpu MHz : 3500.024
cache size : 8192 KB
fdiv_bug : no
hlt_bug : no
f00f_bug : no
coma_bug : no
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 13
wp : yes
flags : fpu de tsc msr pae cx8 sep cmov pat clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht nx unfair_spinlock pni pclmulqdq ssse3 pcid sse4_1 sse4_2 x2apic popcnt tsc_deadline_timer aes avx f16c rdrand hypervisor
bogomips : 7000.04
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 36 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:processor : 2
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 58
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1270 V2 @ 3.50GHz
stepping : 9
cpu MHz : 3500.024
cache size : 8192 KB
fdiv_bug : no
hlt_bug : no
f00f_bug : no
coma_bug : no
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 13
wp : yes
flags : fpu de tsc msr pae cx8 sep cmov pat clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht nx unfair_spinlock pni pclmulqdq ssse3 pcid sse4_1 sse4_2 x2apic popcnt tsc_deadline_timer aes avx f16c rdrand hypervisor
bogomips : 7000.04
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 36 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:processor : 3
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 58
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1270 V2 @ 3.50GHz
stepping : 9
cpu MHz : 3500.024
cache size : 8192 KB
fdiv_bug : no
hlt_bug : no
f00f_bug : no
coma_bug : no
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 13
wp : yes
flags : fpu de tsc msr pae cx8 sep cmov pat clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht nx unfair_spinlock pni pclmulqdq ssse3 pcid sse4_1 sse4_2 x2apic popcnt tsc_deadline_timer aes avx f16c rdrand hypervisor
bogomips : 7000.04
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 36 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:
显然E3的U 而且还是4核心的显然花伞菌搞基非常厉害- -不过也可以反映出罗伊的机子,E3的U 最大只支持32G内存,因此xen的话想超也超不到哪里去,性能有保障。
测试项目二:
空载内存信息:
free -m
total used free shared buffers cached
Mem: 1004 344 659 0 27 250
-/+ buffers/cache: 65 938
Swap: 511 0 511
硬盘空间:
df -h
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/xvda1 25G 1000M 23G 5% /
none 503M 0 503M 0% /dev/shm
显然硬盘已经挂在了。不过如果童鞋们有没有挂在硬盘的vps的话,可以参看挂载硬盘教程:linux将没有格式化的硬盘以ext3格式挂载
测试项目三:
硬盘IO测试:
[root@openvz html]# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=512k count=4k oflag=dsync
4096+0 records in
4096+0 records out
2147483648 bytes (2.1 GB) copied, 13.8214 s, 155 MB/s
[root@openvz html]# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=512k count=4k oflag=dsync
4096+0 records in
4096+0 records out
2147483648 bytes (2.1 GB) copied, 9.3244 s, 230 MB/s
[root@openvz html]# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=512k count=4k oflag=dsync
4096+0 records in
4096+0 records out
2147483648 bytes (2.1 GB) copied, 10.7975 s, 199 MB/s
测试项目四:
端口速率:
in速率
wget http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test
–2013-05-04 12:54:53– http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test
Resolving cachefly.cachefly.net… 205.234.175.175
Connecting to cachefly.cachefly.net|205.234.175.175|:80… connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response… 200 OK
Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/octet-stream]
Saving to: `100mb.test’100%[===========================================================================>] 104,857,600 11.5M/s in 8.9s
2013-05-04 12:55:02 (11.2 MB/s) – `100mb.test’ saved [104857600/104857600]
OUT速率
测试VPS1 傲游VPS
wget http://209.112.254.6/100mb.test
–2013-05-04 20:57:21– http://209.112.254.6/100mb.test
Connecting to 209.112.254.6:80… connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response… 200 OK
Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/x-tar]
Saving to: `100mb.test.1′100%[===========================================================================>] 104,857,600 11.2M/s in 9.0s
2013-05-04 20:57:30 (11.2 MB/s) – `100mb.test.1′ saved [104857600/104857600]
测试VPS2 MYHOST123
wget http://209.112.254.6/100mb.test
–2013-05-04 20:57:36– http://209.112.254.6/100mb.test
Connecting to 209.112.254.6:80… connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response… 200 OK
Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/x-tar]
Saving to: `100mb.test.1′100%[===========================================================================>] 104,857,600 11.2M/s in 9.0s
2013-05-04 20:57:45 (11.1 MB/s) – `100mb.test.1′ saved [104857600/104857600]
显然100M的端口能够很轻松的跑满显然是G口共享的~端口不错~
测试项目五:
Unixbench跑分:400以下为性能低下400-600正常水平,高于1K性能优异。如果朋友们遇到Unixbench跑分出错的问题,欢迎查找:Unixbench 测试脚本错误集锦
# # # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # #
# # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # # #
# # # # # # ## ##### ##### # # # # ######
# # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # #
# # # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # #
#### # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # #Version 5.1.2 Based on the Byte Magazine Unix Benchmark
Multi-CPU version Version 5 revisions by Ian Smith,
Sunnyvale, CA, USA
December 22, 2007 johantheghost at yahoo period com1 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Double-Precision Whetstone 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Execl Throughput 1 2 3
1 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1 2 3
1 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1 2 3
1 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1 2 3
1 x Pipe Throughput 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Pipe-based Context Switching 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Process Creation 1 2 3
1 x System Call Overhead 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1 2 3
1 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1 2 3
4 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
4 x Double-Precision Whetstone 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
4 x Execl Throughput 1 2 3
4 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1 2 3
4 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1 2 3
4 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1 2 3
4 x Pipe Throughput 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
4 x Pipe-based Context Switching 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
4 x Process Creation 1 2 3
4 x System Call Overhead 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
4 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1 2 3
4 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1 2 3
========================================================================
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.2)System: openvz.us: GNU/Linux
OS: GNU/Linux — 2.6.32-358.0.1.el6.i686 — #1 SMP Wed Feb 27 03:24:34 UTC 2013
Machine: i686 (i386)
Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap=”UTF-8″, collate=”UTF-8″)
CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1270 V2 @ 3.50GHz (7000.0 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT
CPU 1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1270 V2 @ 3.50GHz (7000.0 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT
CPU 2: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1270 V2 @ 3.50GHz (7000.0 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT
CPU 3: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1270 V2 @ 3.50GHz (7000.0 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT
11:38:55 up 29 min, 1 user, load average: 0.18, 0.12, 0.04; runlevel 3————————————————————————
Benchmark Run: Sat May 04 2013 11:38:55 – 12:07:03
4 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of testsDhrystone 2 using register variables 28963301.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 3512.6 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 1002.0 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 120479.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 29223.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 447838.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 134456.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 39575.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 1853.6 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 2682.7 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1388.4 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 762119.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 28963301.2 2481.9
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 3512.6 638.7
Execl Throughput 43.0 1002.0 233.0
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 120479.3 304.2
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 29223.2 176.6
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 447838.5 772.1
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 134456.4 108.1
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 39575.9 98.9
Process Creation 126.0 1853.6 147.1
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 2682.7 632.7
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1388.4 2314.0
System Call Overhead 15000.0 762119.2 508.1
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 402.2————————————————————————
Benchmark Run: Sat May 04 2013 12:07:03 – 12:35:11
4 CPUs in system; running 4 parallel copies of testsDhrystone 2 using register variables 119473193.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 14518.2 MWIPS (10.1 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 7368.5 lps (29.7 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 208062.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 52569.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 786246.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 398741.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 150845.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 11212.8 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 11569.3 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1568.8 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 3059885.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 119473193.6 10237.6
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 14518.2 2639.7
Execl Throughput 43.0 7368.5 1713.6
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 208062.2 525.4
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 52569.2 317.6
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 786246.4 1355.6
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 398741.4 320.5
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 150845.5 377.1
Process Creation 126.0 11212.8 889.9
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 11569.3 2728.6
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1568.8 2614.7
System Call Overhead 15000.0 3059885.4 2039.9
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1262.5
显然这个性能非常优异~
测试项目六:
ping值
- 序号
- Ping的地点
- 响应IP
- 响应时间
- TTL
- 赞助商
- 1
- 四川绵阳[电信]
- 209.112.254.6
- 203毫秒
- 50
- 西部数码 云主机
- 2
- 江苏镇江[电信]
- 209.112.254.6
- 151毫秒
- 48
- 雅科诺商务 [高防]
- 3
- 江苏扬州[电信]
- 209.112.254.6
- 147毫秒
- 47
- DiyVM高端云VPS
- 4
- 重庆[电信]
- 209.112.254.6
- 209毫秒
- 50
- 首页互联
- 5
- 陕西西安[电信]
- 209.112.254.6
- 193毫秒
- 49
- 中光电信云vps
- 6
- 四川德阳[电信]
- 209.112.254.6
- 291毫秒
- 48
- 加速乐防黑客
- 7
- 深圳[电信]
- 209.112.254.6
- 154毫秒
- 48
- 香港纵横网连
- 8
- 云南昆明[电信]
- 209.112.254.6
- 190毫秒
- 50
- 云南数据港
- 9
- 四川遂宁[电信]
- 209.112.254.6
- 315毫秒
- 50
- 双线租用450元月
- 10
- 江西[电信]
- 209.112.254.6
- 239毫秒
- 49
- 【180G】硬防双线
- 11
- 安徽淮北[电信]
- 209.112.254.6
- 155毫秒
- 50
- 安徽拓普(双线)
- 12
- 江苏无锡[电信]
- 209.112.254.6
- 141毫秒
- 47
- 优易互联 云主机
- 13
- 香港[电信]
- 209.112.254.6
- 253毫秒
- 54
- 香港纵横网连
- 14
- 上海[电信]
- 209.112.254.6
- 228毫秒
- 49
- 上海龙联[上海高防]
- 15
- 广东东莞[电信]
- 209.112.254.6
- 166毫秒
- 48
- 东莞VPS69元
- 16
- 河南郑州[多线]
- 209.112.254.6
- 234毫秒
- 48
- 易米BGP 云主机
- 17
- 上海[多线]
- 209.112.254.6
- 158毫秒
- 46
- 浦东数据中心(BGP)
- 18
- 北京[多线]
- 209.112.254.6
- 超时
- —
- 北京BGP【免备】
- 19
- 上海[联通]
- 209.112.254.6
- 240毫秒
- 50
- 上海络安数据中心
- 20
- 江苏[联通]
- 209.112.254.6
- 239毫秒
- 51
- 蒲公英100M独享
- 21
- 河南[联通]
- 209.112.254.6
- 259毫秒
- 50
- 腾佑-云计算主机
- 22
- 辽宁[联通]
- 209.112.254.6
- 266毫秒
- 51
- 【180G高防】秒解
- 23
- 深圳[联通]
- 209.112.254.6
- 222毫秒
- 49
- 香港纵横网连
- 24
- 宁波[联通]
- 209.112.254.6
- 212毫秒
- 48
- 【高防】美国双线
- 25
- 安徽滁州[联通]
- 209.112.254.6
- 257毫秒
- 50
- (海外高防专家)
- 26
- 泉州[联通]
- 209.112.254.6
- 222毫秒
- 50
- 三千尺-百兆独享
- 27
- 北京[联通]
- 209.112.254.6
- 243毫秒
- 42
- 北京双线云主机
- 28
- 天津[联通]
- 209.112.254.6
- 超时
- —
- 限时促39元.COM
- 29
- 深圳[移动]
- 209.112.254.6
- 183毫秒
- 47
- 香港纵横网连
- 30
- 福建厦门[移动]
- 209.112.254.6
- 217毫秒
- 47
- 4核100M独享999
- 31
- 上海[移动]
- 209.112.254.6
- 207毫秒
- 49
- 顶邦互联 双线主机
- 32
- 江苏[移动]
- 209.112.254.6
- 211毫秒
- 46
- 蒲公英江苏多线
- 33
- 河北[移动]
- 209.112.254.6
- 233毫秒
- 47
- 北京双线服务器
- 34
- 英国[海外]
- 209.112.254.6
- 142毫秒
- 54
- 全球服务器租用
- 35
- 日本[海外]
- 209.112.254.6
- 122毫秒
- 49
- 国内免备案服务器
- 36
- 加拿大[海外]
- 209.112.254.6
- 72毫秒
- 56
- 【海外双线】高防秒解
- 37
- 香港[海外]
- 209.112.254.6
- 157毫秒
- 52
- 【香港】双线服务器
- 38
- 韩国[海外]
- 209.112.254.6
- 198毫秒
- 48
- 【打不死】高防服务器
- 39
- 美国迈阿密[海外]
- 209.112.254.6
- 6毫秒
- 52
- COMVPS 站群VPS
- 40
- 新加坡[海外]
- 209.112.254.6
- 184毫秒
- 47
- 新速网络(新加坡)
- 41
- 美国堪萨斯[海外]
- 209.112.254.6
- 44毫秒
- 52
- 奇浪网服务器VPS
- 42
- 美国圣何塞[海外]
- 209.112.254.6
- 12毫秒
- 55
- EMSHOST 云主机
- 43
- 美国洛杉矶[海外]
- 209.112.254.6
- 4毫秒
- 57
- 快易互联
- 44
- 德国[海外]
- 209.112.254.6
- 175毫秒
- 54
- 全球服务器
- 45
- 美国圣安娜[海外]
- 209.112.254.6
- 4毫秒
- 56
- 美国KT高速服务器
- 46
- 台湾[海外]
- 209.112.254.6
- 352毫秒
- 45
- 海西数据台湾机房
显然除了一家的连接超时以外,各大运营商的链接都非常不错,甚至扬州电信能够达到140MS非常的理想的PING了~~~总体来说PaulVPS的性能非常优异
官方网址:www.paulvps.com
未经允许不得转载:啊福主机 » PaulVPS 评测