[评测]者也IO 云主机评测

最近Loc的郎中给我发了枚优惠码:jwdns(6折优惠) 说他们家的新VM品牌 者也上线了。这个品牌是JWDNS的旗下子品牌。究竟是主打性价比还是主打稳定性,郎中没和我说。不过看了优惠后的价格,没有其他牌子的价格优势,那么性能优势必定能体现的淋漓尽致了。所以阿福这个质朴的孩纸,本着真实真诚的原则去他们家撸了一发HK,去评测,顺便看看耐不耐操,耐操就住着不走了。

订购的配置如下

CPU:2核心

内存:1G

硬盘:40G

流量:800G@3Mbps(实际上也就是3M不限流量)

IP:1IPv4

架构:KVM

可选系统:Linux、Windows(1G内存的居然也开放了2012支持,看来很有信心么)

刚开通,发现yum没法用,果断是DNS没设置,自行设置了DNS。所以可能是我用的CentOS7 模板,小伙没做好,毕竟用的人比较少?当然如果用solusvm 重装就不会出现这个DNS没设置的问题。

刚刚购买就被人扫了IP 于是只能更改SSH端口了。但是他们家是原版的CentOS 7.1系统,改端口需要这个教程—->点击直达教程

测试项目一:

CPU信息:

CPU核心数量的多少代表着你多线程运行的程序的快慢。当然性能不是绝对有优势的,看卖家把U平分到多少个人头上。不过一般来说U核心越多,性能越好。

[root@hkzy ~]# cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 13
model name : QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6)
stepping : 3
microcode : 0x1
cpu MHz : 2260.998
cache size : 4096 KB
physical id : 0
siblings : 1
core id : 0
cpu cores : 1
apicid : 0
initial apicid : 0
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 4
wp : yes
flags : fpu de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 syscall nx lm nopl pni cx16 hypervisor lahf_lm
bogomips : 4521.99
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:

processor : 1
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 13
model name : QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6)
stepping : 3
microcode : 0x1
cpu MHz : 2260.998
cache size : 4096 KB
physical id : 1
siblings : 1
core id : 0
cpu cores : 1
apicid : 1
initial apicid : 1
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 4
wp : yes
flags : fpu de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 syscall nx lm nopl pni cx16 hypervisor lahf_lm
bogomips : 4521.99
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:

测试项目二:

空载内存信息:

内存是一个VPS最重要的部分之一。显然内存越大能够运行的程序越多,能够承载的访问量也越多。

[root@hkzy ~]# free -m
total used free shared buff/cache available
Mem: 992 60 516 37 416 734
Swap: 511 0 511

效果不错60M的实际使用量。

硬盘:

[root@hkzy ~]# df -h
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/vda1 39G 1.4G 36G 4% /
devtmpfs 487M 0 487M 0% /dev
tmpfs 497M 0 497M 0% /dev/shm
tmpfs 497M 38M 459M 8% /run
tmpfs 497M 0 497M 0% /sys/fs/cgroup
tmpfs 100M 0 100M 0% /run/user/0

装完系统有36G剩余,不错。

测试项目三:

硬盘IO测试:

DD测试硬盘

[root@hkzy ~]# dd if=/dev/zero of=test oflag=direct bs=128k count=5000
5000+0 records in
5000+0 records out
655360000 bytes (655 MB) copied, 4.06767 s, 161 MB/s
[root@hkzy ~]# dd if=/dev/zero of=test oflag=direct bs=128k count=40000
40000+0 records in
40000+0 records out
5242880000 bytes (5.2 GB) copied, 35.0592 s, 150 MB/s
[root@hkzy ~]# dd if=/dev/zero of=test oflag=direct bs=128k count=40000
40000+0 records in
40000+0 records out
5242880000 bytes (5.2 GB) copied, 30.812 s, 170 MB/s
[root@hkzy ~]# dd if=/dev/zero of=test oflag=direct bs=128k count=40000
40000+0 records in
40000+0 records out
5242880000 bytes (5.2 GB) copied, 29.8872 s, 175 MB/s

这个DD耐操,很不错

测试项目四:

端口速率:

Port Speed

IN速率:

[root@hkzy ~]# wget http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test
–2017-03-28 03:16:20– http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test
Resolving cachefly.cachefly.net (cachefly.cachefly.net)… 205.234.175.175
Connecting to cachefly.cachefly.net (cachefly.cachefly.net)|205.234.175.175|:80… connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response… 200 OK
Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/octet-stream]
Saving to: ‘100mb.test’

100%[==============================================>] 104,857,600 3.22MB/s in 30s

2017-03-28 03:16:50 (3.36 MB/s) – ‘100mb.test’ saved [104857600/104857600]

这个In 速率不错,是共享30M的机器

OUT 速率测试

从阿里云下载数据

[rffanlab@aliyunhk ~]$ wget -c http://144.48.5.187/100mb.test
–2017-03-28 15:30:22– http://144.48.5.187/100mb.test
Connecting to 144.48.5.187:80… connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response… 200 OK
Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/octet-stream]
Saving to: ‘100mb.test’

100%[==============================================>] 104,857,600 1.78MB/s in 58s

2017-03-28 15:31:20 (1.71 MB/s) – ‘100mb.test’ saved [104857600/104857600]

从阿里云HK下载的速率非常不错,我的阿里云开的是25M的带宽,能下载到1.7M/S的速率,小伙伴们可以偷着笑了。

测试项目五:

UnixBench Score

Unixbench跑分:400以下为性能低下400-600正常水平,高于1K性能优异。如果朋友们遇到Unixbench跑分出错的问题,欢迎查找:Unixbench 测试脚本错误集锦

yum install -y git

git clone https://github.com/kdlucas/byte-unixbench.git

cd byte-unixbench/UnixBench

make

./Run

# # # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # #
# # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # # #
# # # # # # ## ##### ##### # # # # ######
# # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # #
# # # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # #
#### # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # #

Version 5.1.3 Based on the Byte Magazine Unix Benchmark

Multi-CPU version Version 5 revisions by Ian Smith,
Sunnyvale, CA, USA
January 13, 2011 johantheghost at yahoo period com
1 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10

1 x Double-Precision Whetstone 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Execl Throughput 1 2 3

1 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1 2 3

1 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1 2 3

1 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1 2 3

1 x Pipe Throughput 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Pipe-based Context Switching 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Process Creation 1 2 3

1 x System Call Overhead 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1 2 3

1 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1 2 3

2 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

2 x Double-Precision Whetstone 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

2 x Execl Throughput 1 2 3

2 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1 2 3

2 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1 2 3

2 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1 2 3

2 x Pipe Throughput 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

2 x Pipe-based Context Switching 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

2 x Process Creation 1 2 3

2 x System Call Overhead 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

2 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1 2 3

2 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1 2 3

========================================================================
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3)

System: hkzy.rffanlab.com: GNU/Linux
OS: GNU/Linux — 3.10.0-514.10.2.el7.x86_64 — #1 SMP Fri Mar 3 00:04:05 UTC 2017
Machine: x86_64 (x86_64)
Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap=”UTF-8″, collate=”UTF-8″)
CPU 0: QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6) (4522.0 bogomips)
x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET
CPU 1: QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6) (4522.0 bogomips)
x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET
03:28:39 up 43 min, 4 users, load average: 0.12, 0.16, 0.23; runlevel 2017-03-28

————————————————————————
Benchmark Run: Tue Mar 28 2017 03:28:39 – 03:56:51
2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables 26036187.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 3206.2 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 1689.3 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 536546.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 152374.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1063683.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 1059405.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 173839.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 4090.8 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 4080.7 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 911.4 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 1626537.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 26036187.9 2231.0
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 3206.2 582.9
Execl Throughput 43.0 1689.3 392.9
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 536546.6 1354.9
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 152374.0 920.7
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1063683.1 1833.9
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1059405.4 851.6
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 173839.1 434.6
Process Creation 126.0 4090.8 324.7
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 4080.7 962.4
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 911.4 1519.0
System Call Overhead 15000.0 1626537.3 1084.4
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 882.3

————————————————————————
Benchmark Run: Tue Mar 28 2017 03:56:51 – 04:25:03
2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables 50629948.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 6375.9 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 4323.5 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 727949.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 216293.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1967769.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 2095121.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 349702.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 12648.6 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 6863.7 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 920.8 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 2858959.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 50629948.8 4338.5
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 6375.9 1159.3
Execl Throughput 43.0 4323.5 1005.5
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 727949.2 1838.3
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 216293.6 1306.9
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1967769.3 3392.7
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 2095121.1 1684.2
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 349702.6 874.3
Process Creation 126.0 12648.6 1003.9
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 6863.7 1618.8
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 920.8 1534.6
System Call Overhead 15000.0 2858959.0 1906.0
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1603.3

 

极品啊

路由跟踪:

通过的路由节点越少,说明你到VPS的通信阻力越少

通过最多 30 个跃点跟踪到 应MJJ要求隐藏之 的路由

 

1 <1 毫秒 <1 毫秒 <1 毫秒 192.168.5.1
2 15 ms 3 ms 21 ms 10.93.128.1
3 4 ms 6 ms 2 ms 61.175.72.192
4 * * * 请求超时。
5 * * * 请求超时。
6 * * 135 ms 59.43.80.57
7 30 ms 31 ms 33 ms 59.43.18.233
8 29 ms 33 ms 30 ms 59.43.247.106
9 14 ms * * 219.158.5.229
10 39 ms 39 ms 39 ms 59.43.250.82
11 * * 117 ms 59.43.186.126
12 38 ms 40 ms 38 ms 118.184.22.74
13 * * * 请求超时。
14 * * * 请求超时。
15 40 ms 41 ms 40 ms 144.48.5.187

 

未经允许不得转载:啊福主机-业界第一装逼博客 展现超凡卓绝的装逼技巧 » [评测]者也IO 云主机评测

赞 (0)

评论 3

  • 昵称 (必填)
  • 邮箱 (必填)
  • 网址
  1. 刺猬屌 你QQ回复
  2. 黎叔要学多久才能达到你这种技术水平呢回复
    • 阿福5分钟,复制黏贴即可回复