神父提测:ethernetservers 评测

ethernetservers

 

阿福最近较忙。所以也很少关注VPS平台,好友神父(神父地址:基吧)说其手贱撸了一发年付10美元的大硬盘机器,截图给我看,发现起配置比任何机器都良心!但是阿福知道,一分钱一分货。所以你懂的。神父送来了起送测的鸡鸡

神父送测配置

CPU:4核心

内存:1.5G

硬盘:400G

流量:6T

IPs:1IPv4

架构:OpenVZ

可选系统:linux

一个ls命令直接就花了3s,性能惨不忍睹。一个yum命令运行了30s才开始加载yum的fastmirror插件。其实在这个时候阿福直接建议神父退款。可能比搬瓦工的64m小鸡鸡还不如。

测试项目一:

CPU信息:

CPU核心数量的多少代表着你多线程运行的程序的快慢。当然性能不是绝对有优势的,看卖家把U平分到多少个人头上。不过一般来说U核心越多,性能越好。

processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 60
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1270 v3 @ 3.50GHz
stepping : 3
microcode : 26
cpu MHz : 3500.000
cache size : 8192 KB
physical id : 0
siblings : 8
core id : 0
cpu cores : 4
apicid : 0
initial apicid : 0
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 13
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx pdpe1gb rdtscp lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good xtopology nonstop_tsc aperfmperf cpuid_faulting pni pclmulqdq dtes64 monitor ds_cpl vmx smx est tm2 ssse3 fma cx16 xtpr pdcm pcid sse4_1 sse4_2 x2apic movbe popcnt tsc_deadline_timer aes xsave avx f16c rdrand lahf_lm abm arat epb pln pts dtherm tpr_shadow vnmi flexpriority ept vpid fsgsbase bmi1 hle avx2 smep bmi2 erms invpcid rtm xsaveopt
bogomips : 6999.92
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 39 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:

processor : 1
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 60
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1270 v3 @ 3.50GHz
stepping : 3
microcode : 26
cpu MHz : 3500.000
cache size : 8192 KB
physical id : 0
siblings : 8
core id : 1
cpu cores : 4
apicid : 2
initial apicid : 2
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 13
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx pdpe1gb rdtscp lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good xtopology nonstop_tsc aperfmperf cpuid_faulting pni pclmulqdq dtes64 monitor ds_cpl vmx smx est tm2 ssse3 fma cx16 xtpr pdcm pcid sse4_1 sse4_2 x2apic movbe popcnt tsc_deadline_timer aes xsave avx f16c rdrand lahf_lm abm arat epb pln pts dtherm tpr_shadow vnmi flexpriority ept vpid fsgsbase bmi1 hle avx2 smep bmi2 erms invpcid rtm xsaveopt
bogomips : 6999.92
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 39 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:

processor : 2
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 60
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1270 v3 @ 3.50GHz
stepping : 3
microcode : 26
cpu MHz : 3500.000
cache size : 8192 KB
physical id : 0
siblings : 8
core id : 2
cpu cores : 4
apicid : 4
initial apicid : 4
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 13
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx pdpe1gb rdtscp lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good xtopology nonstop_tsc aperfmperf cpuid_faulting pni pclmulqdq dtes64 monitor ds_cpl vmx smx est tm2 ssse3 fma cx16 xtpr pdcm pcid sse4_1 sse4_2 x2apic movbe popcnt tsc_deadline_timer aes xsave avx f16c rdrand lahf_lm abm arat epb pln pts dtherm tpr_shadow vnmi flexpriority ept vpid fsgsbase bmi1 hle avx2 smep bmi2 erms invpcid rtm xsaveopt
bogomips : 6999.92
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 39 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:

processor : 3
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 60
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1270 v3 @ 3.50GHz
stepping : 3
microcode : 26
cpu MHz : 3500.000
cache size : 8192 KB
physical id : 0
siblings : 8
core id : 3
cpu cores : 4
apicid : 6
initial apicid : 6
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 13
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx pdpe1gb rdtscp lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good xtopology nonstop_tsc aperfmperf cpuid_faulting pni pclmulqdq dtes64 monitor ds_cpl vmx smx est tm2 ssse3 fma cx16 xtpr pdcm pcid sse4_1 sse4_2 x2apic movbe popcnt tsc_deadline_timer aes xsave avx f16c rdrand lahf_lm abm arat epb pln pts dtherm tpr_shadow vnmi flexpriority ept vpid fsgsbase bmi1 hle avx2 smep bmi2 erms invpcid rtm xsaveopt
bogomips : 6999.92
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 39 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:

4核心在阿福看来就是浮云,我去这超瘦的。。

测试项目二:

空载内存信息:

内存是一个VPS最重要的部分之一。显然内存越大能够运行的程序越多,能够承载的访问量也越多。

total used free shared buffers cached
Mem: 1536 90 1445 0 0 77
-/+ buffers/cache: 13 1522
Swap: 1536 0 1536

硬盘

[root@cn123 ~]# df -h
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/simfs 400G 562M 400G 1% /
none 768M 8.0K 768M 1% /dev

测试项目三:

硬盘IO测试:

DD测试硬盘

[root@cn123 unixbench-5.1.3]# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=128k count=4k
4096+0 records in
4096+0 records out
536870912 bytes (537 MB) copied, 4.52871 seconds, 119 MB/s
[root@cn123 unixbench-5.1.3]# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=128k count=4k
4096+0 records in
4096+0 records out
536870912 bytes (537 MB) copied, 14.2449 seconds, 37.7 MB/s
[root@cn123 unixbench-5.1.3]# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=128k count=4k
4096+0 records in
4096+0 records out
536870912 bytes (537 MB) copied, 21.38 seconds, 25.1 MB/s

性能越来越渣的IO测试,预计是第一次测试的时候有人也dd了,所以缓存直接读了,实际性能请往后面2个看。。

测试项目四:

端口速率:

Port Speed

IN速率:

[root@cn123 unixbench-5.1.3]# wget http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test
–2015-07-08 23:02:24– http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test
Resolving cachefly.cachefly.net… 205.234.175.175
Connecting to cachefly.cachefly.net|205.234.175.175|:80… connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response… 200 OK
Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/octet-stream]
Saving to: `100mb.test’

100%[====================================================================================================================================================================================================================================>] 104,857,600 3.11M/s in 36s

2015-07-08 23:03:01 (2.78 MB/s) – `100mb.test’ saved [104857600/104857600]

平均进口3M多点。。这个。。好吧,好像好严重的样子。

测试项目五:

UnixBench Score

Unixbench跑分:400以下为性能低下400-600正常水平,高于1K性能优异。如果朋友们遇到Unixbench跑分出错的问题,欢迎查找:Unixbench 测试脚本错误集锦

wget http://byte-unixbench.googlecode.com/files/unixbench-5.1.3.tgz

tar zxvf unixbench-5.1.3.tgz

cd unixbench-5.1.3

make

./Run

# # # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # #
# # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # # #
# # # # # # ## ##### ##### # # # # ######
# # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # #
# # # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # #
#### # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # #

Version 5.1.2 Based on the Byte Magazine Unix Benchmark

Multi-CPU version Version 5 revisions by Ian Smith,
Sunnyvale, CA, USA
December 22, 2007 johantheghost at yahoo period com

 

Version 5.1.2 Based on the Byte Magazine Unix Benchmark

Multi-CPU version Version 5 revisions by Ian Smith,
Sunnyvale, CA, USA
December 22, 2007 johantheghost at yahoo period com
1 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Double-Precision Whetstone 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Execl Throughput 1 2 3

1 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1 2 3

1 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1 2 3

1 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1 2 3

1 x Pipe Throughput 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Pipe-based Context Switching 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Process Creation 1 2 3

1 x System Call Overhead 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1 2 3

1 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1 2 3

4 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

4 x Double-Precision Whetstone 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

4 x Execl Throughput 1 2 3

4 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1 2 3

4 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1 2 3

4 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1 2 3

4 x Pipe Throughput 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

4 x Pipe-based Context Switching 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

4 x Process Creation 1 2 3

4 x System Call Overhead 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

4 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1 2 3

4 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1 2 3

========================================================================
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.2)

System: cn123: GNU/Linux
OS: GNU/Linux — 2.6.32-042stab108.5 — #1 SMP Wed Jun 17 20:20:17 MSK 2015
Machine: i686 (i386)
Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap=”UTF-8″, collate=”UTF-8″)
CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1270 v3 @ 3.50GHz (6999.9 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1270 v3 @ 3.50GHz (6999.9 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 2: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1270 v3 @ 3.50GHz (6999.9 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 3: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1270 v3 @ 3.50GHz (6999.9 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
21:50:39 up 7:30, 2 users, load average: 0.64, 0.29, 0.25; runlevel 3

————————————————————————
Benchmark Run: Wed Jul 08 2015 21:50:42 – 22:19:39
4 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables 19090437.3 lps (10.2 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 3013.9 MWIPS (10.1 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 5881.7 lps (29.7 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 229095.4 KBps (30.1 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 29354.2 KBps (30.4 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 144160.0 KBps (30.4 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 1889619.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 238464.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 15691.7 lps (30.2 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1416.1 lpm (60.6 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 395.6 lpm (61.3 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 3035284.5 lps (10.1 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 19090437.3 1635.9
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 3013.9 548.0
Execl Throughput 43.0 5881.7 1367.8
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 229095.4 578.5
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 29354.2 177.4
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 144160.0 248.6
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1889619.4 1519.0
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 238464.2 596.2
Process Creation 126.0 15691.7 1245.4
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 1416.1 334.0
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 395.6 659.4
System Call Overhead 15000.0 3035284.5 2023.5
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 707.4

————————————————————————
Benchmark Run: Wed Jul 08 2015 22:19:39 – 22:49:26
4 CPUs in system; running 4 parallel copies of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables 58265401.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 11732.7 MWIPS (10.1 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 18157.3 lps (29.4 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 69053.4 KBps (30.3 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 23371.5 KBps (30.7 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 68054.9 KBps (30.2 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 6140166.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 1072097.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 39697.4 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 960.2 lpm (63.2 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 289.4 lpm (60.7 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 7817683.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 58265401.8 4992.8
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 11732.7 2133.2
Execl Throughput 43.0 18157.3 4222.6
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 69053.4 174.4
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 23371.5 141.2
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 68054.9 117.3
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 6140166.1 4935.8
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 1072097.8 2680.2
Process Creation 126.0 39697.4 3150.6
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 960.2 226.5
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 289.4 482.3
System Call Overhead 15000.0 7817683.9 5211.8
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1098.4

测试项目六:

Ping From China

线路 最快节点 最慢节点 平均响应
所有线路 洛杉矶[海外] 山东[多线] 198毫秒
电信 台湾[电信] 江西[电信] 225毫秒
多线 北京[多线] 山东[多线] 212毫秒
联通 广东深圳[联通] 湖南[联通] 254毫秒
移动 广东深圳[移动] 福建[移动] 201毫秒
海外 洛杉矶[海外] 香港[海外] 65毫秒

 

从上面的跑分看,还是勉强的。但是。从阿福的使用体验看,我去,一个命令要起码3秒执行的。那么,阿福肯定会直接抛弃的。。嗯,这家VPS阿福不建议上。

作者: 阿福

购买时被坑爹的枪手坑了。只知道介绍如何如何的好,不知道介绍其坏处。因此,写此博客,望能给各大网友帮助。

《神父提测:ethernetservers 评测》有4个想法

发表评论

电子邮件地址不会被公开。 必填项已用*标注