VPS.NET 评测

vpsnet

本来想弄ping测试的结果在过了一天之后就无法ping了。看来vps.net和vr弄了一样的禁ping。阿福昨天刚弄的时候是能够ping通的,不过貌似ping值在100ms左右,联通和移动的ping低于100ms,电信的要稍高。嗯是JP数据中心。看来和linode还有樱花是同样类型的都是联通友好型。

评测项目:

1、lnmp时间(采用编译安装,因此时间的长短也能从侧面反映出性能)

2、端口测试(官方是G口保证,但是我们还是来测试一下吧)

3、unix bench (专业性能测试软件)

本次测试环境采用 VPS.NET日本节点的vps,官方配置如下

CPU:2核心

内存:376M

硬盘:10G

IPs:1IPv4

架构:xen onapp

系统:centos 5.6 64bit(TMD全64位的。难道不知道64位的在小内存下就是鸡肋么)

数据中心:日本

测试开始时间:北京时间22:00 在日本网络拥堵的时间。

项目一:

cachefly wget测试
命令:wget http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test

–2013-04-13 15:32:02– http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test
Resolving cachefly.cachefly.net… 205.234.175.175
Connecting to cachefly.cachefly.net|205.234.175.175|:80… connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response… 200 OK
Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/octet-stream]
Saving to: `100mb.test’

100%[======================================>] 104,857,600 50.1M/s in 2.0s

2013-04-13 15:32:05 (50.1 MB/s) – `100mb.test’ saved [104857600/104857600]

速度是50M/S确实G口无疑只是没跑满的G口~百M的口子最高只能跑12.5M/S

项目二:

lnmp安装时间:

(由于日本下载美国的程序- -速度有些不理想,确切的说下载军歌的不理想看看上面的吧。导致时间有些长,因此阿福建议下载full package的lnmp来安装。)

Active Internet connections (only servers)
Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address               Foreign Address             State
tcp        0      0 0.0.0.0:3306                0.0.0.0:*                   LISTEN
tcp        0      0 0.0.0.0:111                 0.0.0.0:*                   LISTEN
tcp        0      0 0.0.0.0:80                  0.0.0.0:*                   LISTEN
tcp        0      0 127.0.0.1:25                0.0.0.0:*                   LISTEN
tcp        0      0 :::22                       :::*                        LISTEN
real 3713.79
user 1012.89
sys 331.20

总计时间是3713秒。。天哪太长了点吧?

项目三:

Unixbench测试

脚本为:unixbench-5.1.2

下载地址:http://byte-unixbench.googlecode.com/files/unixbench-5.1.2.tar.gz

使用方法:

sed -i “s/GRAPHIC_TESTS = defined/#GRAPHIC_TESTS = defined/g” ./Makefile
make;
./Run;

测试结果:

   #    #  #    #  #  #    #          #####   ######  #    #   ####   #    #
#    #  ##   #  #   #  #           #    #  #       ##   #  #    #  #    #
#    #  # #  #  #    ##            #####   #####   # #  #  #       ######
#    #  #  # #  #    ##            #    #  #       #  # #  #       #    #
#    #  #   ##  #   #  #           #    #  #       #   ##  #    #  #    #
####   #    #  #  #    #          #####   ######  #    #   ####   #    #

Version 5.1.2                      Based on the Byte Magazine Unix Benchmark

Multi-CPU version                  Version 5 revisions by Ian Smith,
Sunnyvale, CA, USA
December 22, 2007                  johantheghost at yahoo period com

1 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Double-Precision Whetstone  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Execl Throughput  1 2 3

1 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks  1 2 3

1 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks  1 2 3

1 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks  1 2 3

1 x Pipe Throughput  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Pipe-based Context Switching  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Process Creation  1 2 3

1 x System Call Overhead  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)  1 2 3

1 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)  1 2 3

2 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

2 x Double-Precision Whetstone  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

2 x Execl Throughput  1 2 3

2 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks  1 2 3

2 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks  1 2 3

2 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks  1 2 3

2 x Pipe Throughput  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

2 x Pipe-based Context Switching  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

2 x Process Creation  1 2 3

2 x System Call Overhead  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

2 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)  1 2 3

2 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)  1 2 3

========================================================================
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.2)

System: vpsnet.localdomain: GNU/Linux
OS: GNU/Linux — 2.6.18-194.17.4.el5xen — #1 SMP Mon Oct 25 16:36:31 EDT 2010
Machine: x86_64 (x86_64)
Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap=”UTF-8″, collate=”UTF-8″)
CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5620 @ 2.40GHz (6012.4 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET
CPU 1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5620 @ 2.40GHz (6012.4 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET
15:43:36 up 1 day, 45 min,  2 users,  load average: 0.04, 0.02, 0.23; runlevel 3

————————————————————————
Benchmark Run: Sat Apr 13 2013 15:43:36 – 16:11:38
2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables       12231647.1 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                     1315.3 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                               1270.8 lps   (29.9 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        178842.7 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks           47021.6 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks        541567.2 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                              265463.6 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                  64023.8 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                               3135.2 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   2877.4 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                    587.3 lpm   (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                         228118.0 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   12231647.1   1048.1
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       1315.3    239.1
Execl Throughput                                 43.0       1270.8    295.5
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     178842.7    451.6
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0      47021.6    284.1
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0     541567.2    933.7
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0     265463.6    213.4
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0      64023.8    160.1
Process Creation                                126.0       3135.2    248.8
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4       2877.4    678.6
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0        587.3    978.8
System Call Overhead                          15000.0     228118.0    152.1
========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                         374.5

————————————————————————
Benchmark Run: Sat Apr 13 2013 16:11:38 – 16:39:38
2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables       24305918.0 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                     2627.2 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                               2440.2 lps   (29.6 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        174832.1 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks           46092.1 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks        552386.4 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                              521034.3 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                 143886.0 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                               5746.0 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   4168.7 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                    626.6 lpm   (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                         434444.9 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   24305918.0   2082.8
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       2627.2    477.7
Execl Throughput                                 43.0       2440.2    567.5
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     174832.1    441.5
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0      46092.1    278.5
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0     552386.4    952.4
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0     521034.3    418.8
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0     143886.0    359.7
Process Creation                                126.0       5746.0    456.0
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4       4168.7    983.2
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0        626.6   1044.4
System Call Overhead                          15000.0     434444.9    289.6
========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                         576.6

测试结果评说:

结果似乎不怎么理想。不过阿福猜测是不是折腾的人太多了?毕竟赵容也是用vps.net来提供日本cpanel虚拟主机的。嗯。还有人打算先玩了然后删除node存60刀,但是据赵容所说,貌似删了node20刀不会退还到账户- -因此阿福还是先用着把,后天上妹纸站~看看妹纸站能不能月入20刀,能的话,那么就当给vps.net做贡献了~

点击进入购买

未经允许不得转载:啊福主机 » VPS.NET 评测

赞 (0)

评论 14

  • 昵称 (必填)
  • 邮箱 (必填)
  • 网址
  1. 免费资源部落得分还是挺高的。。回复
    • 阿福- -500多分,算是低了。。。回复
  2. 飛天鼠我還是想不明白,爲什麽還有人會用軍哥的一鍵包。。。。回复
    • 阿福因为我很懒。。。所以用军哥的。。。尼玛你又不出centos的。。。debian的有啥用。。回复
  3. ISOFTEE.COM:mrgreen: vps好,还是云主机好呢回复
    • 阿福俩个是同样的玩意。回复
  4. 南寻博客没收入,买不起VPS...回复
    • 阿福免费的,支持财付通运通卡。你可以去试试看的~回复
  5. 梦月酱大神厉害!! 仰慕大神VPS..回复
    • 阿福尼玛。。传奇玩的如何?回复
  6. 便宜VPS不错,稳定就好~回复
    • 阿福稳定性。貌似大公司值得信赖回复
  7. 赵容额,我也不用VPS.NET的日本卖主机了,不划算我买了5个node上人压力大永远回不了本,我把人都换到台湾的E3独立服务器了。。。回复
    • 阿福额,怪不得你后台那会有台湾的分销了。。回复